Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature.
Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature.
复制标题
对公正世界的信仰：个体差异文献的回顾和批判。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1989
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Procter
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Furnham;E. Procter
本文试图对上次重大评论十年后有关自我报告的公正世界信仰的文献进行批判性评论。审查的主要焦点是调查问卷得出的公正世界信念与其他心理和人口变量之间的关系。 Rubin & Peplau (1973, 1975) 衡量世界信念的量表的许多相关性被记录和评估。特别是针对公正世界概念的多维性质的批评。此外，有人提出存在三个正交的世界——正义、非正义和随机。提出了关于制定改进的自我报告测量方法以及个人和不同文化中公正世界信念的病因学研究方向的建议。
This article attempts a critical review of the literature on self-reported just world beliefs a decade after the last major review. The main focus of the review is on the relationship between questionnaire-derived beliefs in a just world and other psychological and demographic variables. Numerous correlates of the Rubin & Peplau (1973, 1975) scale to measure just world beliefts are documented and evaluated. Particular criticism is aimed at the multidimensional nature of the concept of a just world. Furthermore, it is suggested that three worlds exist — just, unjust and random — that are orthogonal. Suggestions are made about the development of an improved self-report measure and the direction of research into the aetiology of a belief in a just world in an individual as well as in different cultures.