Multiple True‐False Items: A Study of Interitem Correlations, Scoring Alternatives, and Reliability Estimation
Multiple True‐False Items: A Study of Interitem Correlations, Scoring Alternatives, and Reliability Estimation
复制标题
多个真假项目：项目间相关性、评分方案和可靠性估计的研究
DOI：
10.1111/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00296.x
复制
发表时间：
1988
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
D. Sabers
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Albanese;D. Sabers
多个真假项目之间的相互关系进行了检查，以确定在何种程度上每个真假选项可以被视为独立的。对157名健康科学专业学生和170名医学专业学生的调查结果表明，与同一词干相关的真假选项之间的相关性是不同词干相关性的2.6 ~ 7.0倍。这表明，以前的研究表明，每个真假选项可以被视为一个独立的项目，不能推广到其他测试和考生群体没有支持的证据。四种评分方法进行了探讨，不同的机会成功水平和评分的部分知识。结果表明，结合部分知识的评分方法比那些最小化成功机会的评分方法更可靠，具有更大的并发效度和预测效度。计算可靠性估计的方法进行了比较，并就实际使用提出了建议
Intercorrelations among multiple true-false items were examined to determine to what extent each true-false option can be treated as independent. Results from 157 health science students and 170 medical students showed that correlations between true-false options associated with the same stem were from 2.6 to 7.0 times larger than those from different stems. This suggests that results from previous research indicating that each true-false option could be treated as an independent item cannot be generalized to other tests and examinee populations without supporting evidence. Four scoring methods were explored which varied chance success levels and scoring for partial knowledge. The results showed that scoring methods incorporating partial knowledge were more reliable and possessed greater concurrent and predictive validity than those minimizing chance success. Methods for computing reliability estimates were compared and suggestions were offered regarding practical use