The Gender Gap: Who Is (and Is Not) Included on Graduate-Level Syllabi in Social/Personality Psychology
The Gender Gap: Who Is (and Is Not) Included on Graduate-Level Syllabi in Social/Personality Psychology
复制标题
性别差距：谁被（或不被）纳入社会/人格心理学研究生课程大纲中
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Kevin Y Wei
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Skitka;Z. Melton;Allison B. Mueller;Kevin Y Wei
我们随机联系了一些美国的社会/人格心理学家，向他们索要研究生教学大纲的复印件。我们对这些教学大纲中引用的3,400多篇论文进行了编码，包括作者的性别以及其他特征。在这些大纲中引用的论文中，只有不到30%是由女性第一作者撰写的，没有证据表明自20世纪80年代以来女性第一作者发表的论文越来越多。女性第一作者论文纳入率的差异不能解释为在教学大纲中优先纳入经典论文而不是当代论文（有证据表明存在近因偏见）或女性第一作者论文在已发表文献中的相对可用性。的影响进行了讨论。
We contacted a random sample of social/personality psychologists in the United States and asked for copies of their graduate syllabi. We coded more than 3,400 papers referenced on these syllabi for gender of authors as well as other characteristics. Less than 30% of the papers referenced on these syllabi were written by female first authors, with no evidence of a trend toward greater inclusion of papers published by female first authors since the 1980s. The difference in inclusion rates of female first-authored papers could not be explained by a preference for including classic over contemporary papers in syllabi (there was evidence of a recency bias instead) or the relative availability of female first-authored papers in the published literature. Implications are discussed.
影响因子：
16.4
作者：
Steele, CM
通讯作者：
Steele, CM