Disparities in renal replacement in lupus nephritis: current practice and future implications.
Disparities in renal replacement in lupus nephritis: current practice and future implications.
复制标题
狼疮性肾炎肾脏替代的差异:当前实践和未来影响。
DOI:
10.1002/acr.20611
复制
发表时间:
2011
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Weisman,MichaelH
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ishimori,MarikoL;Gudsoorkar,Vineet;Venuturupalli,SwamyR;Weisman,MichaelH
Health disparities are well known to exist in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The incidence and prevalence of SLE have been reported to be higher among African Americans, Asians, and Hispanics compared to European Americans in the US (1–3). A younger median age of disease incidence and prevalence in African American and Hispanic women has been noted along with lower socioeconomic status (2–4). Significant ethnic disparities have also been reported in disease outcomes, with greater damage and disease severity in African American and Texas Hispanics than in whites and Puerto Rican Hispanics in the LUpus in MInorities, NAture versus nurture cohort along with different genetic associations (4). Among the protean manifestations of SLE, the development of lupus nephritis (LN) predicts poor survival and is more common and severe in African American, Hispanic, and Asian patients in the US (5). In addition, response to treatment has been shown to vary by age, sex, location, and race/ethnicity, with risk for more aggressive disease in specific groups. All of these issues point to an unmet need for identifying modifiable risk factors for outcome. In this issue of Arthritis Care & Research, Devlin et al (6) examine the clinical factors and comorbidities associated with the initial choice of renal replacement therapies (RRTs) among 11,317 patients with LN end-stage renal disease (ESRD) identified in the US Renal Data System out of all the ESRD patients receiving any RRT during a 12-year span. The subjects were ages 18–80 years, and SLE was given as the cause of ESRD at enrollment into the USRenal Data System. The source of the registry data is a Medical Evidence Report Form completed by an attending nephrologist. As a result of this analysis, Devlin et al reported that hemodialysis (HD) was the predominant mode chosen (85%) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) constituted a smaller group (12.2%). Only 2.8% of the patients proceeded directly to transplant. In addition, over the time span of the study, there was a steady decline from 16.8% to 9.7% in the proportion of patients who were placed on PD, and there was a slight increase of 1.7% to 3.7% of patients receiving preemptive transplant in the same time period. On multivariate analyses, within the PD group, patients were more often found to be women, younger, white, employed, and privately insured. These PD patients also generally had better surrogates for health (higher hemoglobin and albumin levels) and were more hypertensive than the HD group, while comorbidities such as congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and the inability to ambulate were associated with decreased utilization of PD. Similarly, patients receiving preemptive renal transplantation were significantly younger, with a greater proportion of them being privately insured, employed, white, and non-Hispanic patients, who were less often from the South. There were no data available on the long-term outcomes specific to the renal replacement mode chosen.