In the name of morality: moral responsibility, whiteness and social justice education
In the name of morality: moral responsibility, whiteness and social justice education
复制标题
以道德之名：道德责任、白人与社会正义教育
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Applebaum
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Applebaum
本文认为，“传统的道德责任观”授权和支持否认白色同谋。首先，什么是“传统的道德责任观”的意思是划定和启用和禁用这种观点的特点突出。然后，讨论了白色学生经常参与的三个看似良好的反种族主义话语-色盲的话语，精英统治的话语和个人选择的话语-并分析了它们是如何植根于“传统的道德责任观”。这些话语的局限性，并得出这些话语如何工作，以掩盖白色同谋成立。最后，对社会公正教育的启示进行了讨论。
This paper argues that the ‘traditional conception of moral responsibility’ authorizes and supports denials of white complicity. First, what is meant by the ‘traditional conception of moral responsibility’ is delineated and the enabling and disenabling characteristics of this view are highlighted. Then, three seemingly good, antiracist discourses that white students often engage in are discussed – the discourse of colour‐blindness, the discourse of meritocracy and the discourse of individual choice – and analysed to show how they are all grounded in the ‘traditional conception of moral responsibility’. The limitations of these discourses are drawn and how these discourses work to conceal white complicity is established. Finally, implications for social justice education are discussed.