Benefits of permanent adoption of virtual conferences for conservation science
Benefits of permanent adoption of virtual conferences for conservation science
复制标题
永久采用保护科学虚拟会议的好处
DOI:
10.1111/cobi.13884
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
6.3
通讯作者:
LeRoy, Carri J.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kuehne, Lauren M.;Rolls, Robert J.;Brandis, Kate J.;Chen, Kai;Fraley, Kevin M.;Frost, Lindsey K.;Ho, Susie S.;Kunisch, Erin H.;Langhans, Simone D.;LeRoy, Carri J.
Disruptive events can trigger societal transformations with beneficial outcomes (Walker et al., 2020). For scientific professions, the COVID-19 pandemic triggered a comprehensive shift from in-person workshops, seminars, and conferences to the use of virtual formats for research and knowledge dissemination (eg, Viglione, 2020). Despite the merits of virtual conferencing being advocated since the development of the internet (eg, Reay, 2003; Gichora et al., 2010; Blackman et al., 2020), ecological and environmental sciences have historically relied on in-person events, and adoption of virtual conferencing for knowledge sharing and networking during so-called lockdowns and travel restrictions represented a radical change. Compelled by COVID-19, many conferences rapidly shifted to virtual formats. However, the combination of professional and personal attachment to in-person conferences, hopes of the effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19, and organizations planning to host solely in-person events as soon as possible suggests we risk missing an unparalleled opportunity to permanently reimagine scientific conferences to benefit the practice and culture of conservation research.Conferences are deeply embedded in the culture of ecology (Sanders et al., 2020). For example, early career researchers and practitioners may aim to attend 1–2 national or international conferences annually. Registration costs for in-person events typically span 600–1000 pounds, Euros, or dollars, requiring grants, scholarships, or personal funds. Prior to COVID-19, inperson events were the primary and, in most cases, sole format for ecology and conservation conferences (eg, Ecological Society of America, Society for Conservation Biology, and World Fisheries Congress), where routinely hundreds to thousands of
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
Stroud, James T.;Feeley, Kenneth J.
通讯作者:
Feeley, Kenneth J.
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Bonar, Scott A.
通讯作者:
Bonar, Scott A.
影响因子:
11.4
作者:
K. Sanders;Maria L. Kraimer;Lindsey M Greco;F. Morgeson;P. Budhwar;J. Sun;H. Shipton;X. Sang
通讯作者:
X. Sang
影响因子:
7.7
作者:
Sarabipour S
通讯作者:
Sarabipour S
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Niner, Holly J.;Wassermann, Sophia N.
通讯作者:
Wassermann, Sophia N.