OF ALCOHOL AND MEN – SURVIVAL, MASCULINITIES AND ANTI-INSTITUTIONALISM OF POLISH HOMELESS MEN IN A GLOBAL CITY
OF ALCOHOL AND MEN – SURVIVAL, MASCULINITIES AND ANTI-INSTITUTIONALISM OF POLISH HOMELESS MEN IN A GLOBAL CITY
复制标题
酒精与男性的关系——全球城市中波兰无家可归男性的生存、男子气概和反制度主义
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Garapich
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Garapich
来自加入国（尤其是来自波兰）的移民中出现的无家可归和露宿街头的问题，反映在最近的无家可归服务机构的统计数据（Homeless Link 2006、2008、2010）、媒体关注（Ramesh 2010）、地方和中央政府对重新连接项目的资助增加（Thames Reach 2010）以及英国移民警察（UKBA）强制驱逐做法的强化等方面。这是 2004 年和 2007 年向 10 个入盟国家开放英国劳动力市场的后果之一，但长期以来一直被忽视。过去两年，露宿者数量急剧增加后，警钟才开始敲响。事实上，现在四分之一的伦敦露宿者来自欧盟 A8 国家（Homeless Link 2010），而在首都的一些日间中心，一半或更多的客户来自 A8 国家（Garapich 2010），其中波兰国民占主导地位，这一事实确实需要解释为什么会发生这种情况。随着英国联合政府设想和实施的经济和公共支出削减的动荡时期，关键问题是：这是一种稳定的累积增长，会变得更糟，还是只是一次增长，最终会随着时间的推移而趋于平稳，就像八十年代中期伦敦无家可归者问题得到相当成功的处理一样（Fitzpatrick 2000），尽管当时采用的机制具有干预主义和侵略性，旨在“消除”无家可归者的问题。来自城市空间的不受欢迎的人（Cloke, May, Johnsen 2010; May 2000）。
The emergence of the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping among migrants from Accession States, most notably from Poland refl ected in recent homeless services agencies’ statistics (Homeless Link 2006, 2008, 2010) the media attention (Ramesh 2010), increased local and central government funding for reconnection projects (Thames Reach 2010) and intensifi cation of forced removal practices undertaken by British immigration police (UKBA) is one of the consequences of the opening of the British labour market to 10 Accession states in 2004 and 2007 that has been overlooked for some time. It took a dramatic increase in number of rough sleepers in the last two years for alarm bells to start ringing. The fact that one in four London rough sleepers is now from A8 EU states (Homeless Link 2010), and in some day centres in the capital half or more clients are from A8 countries (Garapich 2010), with a striking dominance of Polish nationals, really begs an explanation as to why this is occurring. With turbulent times ahead in terms of both the economy as well as public spending cuts, conceived and implemented by the British coalition government, the crucial question would thus be: is this a steady cumulative growth which will get worse or just a oneoff rise which will eventually level off in time, in similar way as homelessness in London in the mid-80s was dealt with rather successfully (Fitzpatrick 2000) although mechanisms employed then were of an interventionist and aggressive nature designed to ‘remove’ the undesirable people from urban spaces (Cloke, May, Johnsen 2010; May 2000).