Priming and theories of memory : a reply to Ratcliff and McKoon
Priming and theories of memory : a reply to Ratcliff and McKoon
复制标题
记忆启动和理论：对拉特克利夫和麦库恩的答复
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. McNamara
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. McNamara
拉特克利夫和麦昆（1994）试图通过证明第一反应自由联想概率不能预测启动效应，并且词汇决策中的顺序效应至少可以由一个非扩散激活模型预测来支持联想启动的非扩散激活模型。作者认为，他们试图从自由联想中预测启动是没有信息的，因为他们没有提出一个模型，说明记忆中的联想是如何在自由联想中表现出来的，这些预测依赖于与所测试的模型不一致的假设，复合线索模型是一个不好的顺序效应模型，非扩散激活模型仍然不能解释当不需要对启动反应时，非词启动后抑制的缺失
Ratcliff and McKoon (1994) attempt to buttress the case for non-spreading-activation models of associative priming by showing that first-response free association probabilities do not predict priming effects, and sequential effects in lexical decisions are predicted by at least one non-spreadingactivation model. The author argues that their attempt to predict priming from free association is not informative because they did not propose a model of how association in memory is manifested in free association, these predictions depended on assumptions that are not consistent with the model tested, the compound-cue model is a poor model of sequential effects, and non-spreading-activation models still cannot explain the absence of inhibition following nonword primes when responses to the primes are not required