Democratising Smart Cities? Penta-Helix Multistakeholder Social Innovation Framework
Democratising Smart Cities? Penta-Helix Multistakeholder Social Innovation Framework
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/smartcities3040057
复制
发表时间：
2020-12-01
期刊：
影响因子：
6.4
通讯作者：
Calzada, Igor
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Calzada, Igor
智慧城市政策方法已在地平线2020计划下在欧洲城市得到密集实施。然而，这些实施不仅减少了利益相关者之间的相互依赖性，以技术官僚的公私合作伙伴关系（PPP）模式，但也未能质疑战略利益相关者的身份，以及他们如何优先考虑他们的商业/社会模式。这些方面使民主在智慧城市中处于危险之中。因此，本文旨在从社会创新的角度展开和操作多利益相关者的政策框架，建议从头五螺旋框架，包括公共，私人，学术界，公民社会和社会企业家/活动家，以扩展三重和四重螺旋框架。基于2017年2月至2018年12月进行的实地行动研究-三角案头研究，75次访谈和三次验证研讨会-本文应用五螺旋框架绘制了与以下相关的五个战略维度：（i）多利益相关者螺旋框架和（ii）在H2020-复制项目的三个追随城市中比较产生的商业/社会模式：埃森（德国）、洛桑（瑞士）和尼卢费尔（土耳其）。对于每一个案例研究，研究结果表明：（一）一个独特的多利益相关者组成，（二）不同的偏好，商业/社会模式，（三）定期存在的第五螺旋作为中介，和（四）愿意试验民主安排超越霸权的公私伙伴关系。
The smart cities policy approach has been intensively implemented in European cities under the Horizon 2020 programme. However, these implementations not only reduce the interdependencies among stakeholders to technocratic Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) models, but also fail to question the identities of strategic stakeholders and how they prioritise their business/social models. These aspects are putting democracy at stake in smart cities. Therefore, this article aims to unfold and operationalise multistakeholders' policy frameworks from the social innovation perspective by suggesting the ex-novo penta-helix framework-including public, private, academia, civic society, and social entrepreneurs/activists-to extend the triple and quadruple-helix frameworks. Based on fieldwork action research conducted from February 2017 to December 2018-triangulating desk research, 75 interviews, and three validation workshops-this article applies the penta-helix framework to map out five strategic dimensions related to (i) multistakeholder helix framework and (ii) the resulting business/social models comparatively in three follower cities of the H2020-Replicate project: Essen (Germany), Lausanne (Switzerland), and Nilufer (Turkey). For each case study, the findings reveal: (i) a unique multistakeholder composition, (ii) diverse preferences on business/social models, (iii) a regular presence of the fifth helix as intermediaries, and (iv) the willingness to experiment with democratic arrangements beyond the hegemonic PPP.