Searching for Swing: Participatory Discrepancies in the Jazz Rhythm Section
Searching for Swing: Participatory Discrepancies in the Jazz Rhythm Section
复制标题
寻找摇摆乐:爵士节奏部分的参与性差异
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1995
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Progler
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Progler
beat" based upon vertical axis: milliseconds before (-) or after Adeyola's bassline (+), by increments of 5 A macro view of the same kind of comparison shown in Figure 7, except here we see only one set of relationships. For the purposes of illustrating Sinclair's and Qadir's ridetaps in relation to the beat, Adeyola's bassline has been treated as an abstract "beat," and therefore appears as a straight line. This content downloaded from 157.55.39.104 on Mon, 20 Jun 2016 05:36:00 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Searching for Swing 43 bars 5, 6, 7 and 8). Recalling that they did not hear one another during this experiment, but that they did play to identical basslines, this phenomenon might be related to something they each heard in the bassline which made them move into a particular niche and then switch to another. It is almost as if the two tappers have an opposite conception of what swings, judging from these excerpts, at least. This appears so until about bar 9, when the two ridetaps suddenly appear to converge. Is this again related to something in the bassline, or is it their own individual senses of "bringin' it on home" or "rollin' up" as the final phrase of the chord progression leads back to the top? What exactly is the role of syntax in relation to groove in these and other performances? Are these the places where syntax engages groove? These are the kinds of questions that the ethnographer can attempt to answer, perhaps even in the context of a shared relistening with the musicians, after performances like these have been analyzed for kinds and places of participatory discrepancies. The "catching up" phenomenon, as noted earlier in Keil's ridetaps, takes on a different shade of meaning in Sinclair and Qadir's performances. The two change their orientations at around beat 4 of measure 1, as Keil did, but the complete graph in Figure 8 shows that this may not be "catching up" but instead could illustrate a cyclical approach to playing. Sinclair and Qadir appear to cycle their ridetaps in and out of phase with the bassline, unlike Keil, who, once "caught up," stayed in that niche. Does this mean that Qadir and Sinclair are looser than Keil? More "playful"? It could be that Keil had more of a preconceived notion of what he wanted to do, whereas Sinclair and Qadir were going with the groove. Whatever the answers to these compelling questions, these results have allowed us to begin to comment upon stylistic elements at a subsyntactical level. What are a musician's perceptions-both conscious and unconsciousin relation to "the other?" The "other" in the cases shown above has been a pre-recorded bassline, but could have been another performer. Interaction may be heightened in a live situation with more participants, or it may actually be subdued. Certain kinds of participatory discrepancies may decrease as the number of performers increases. One performer has to generate swing alone, but with two a kind of push/pull interaction begins. And perhaps with a full ensemble each person's participatory discrepancies will tend toward shifting from ahead to behind, and back to ahead, as the performers constantly re-orient themselves to each other, sliding in and out of phase with each other. In sum, participatory discrepancies appear to be contingent upon context and personal touches, but we need more experimenting and interviewing to get at these issues.19 Turning to another set of performers, this time from a commercial "music-minus-one" recording featuring bassist Steve Rodby and drummer This content downloaded from 157.55.39.104 on Mon, 20 Jun 2016 05:36:00 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 44 Ethnomusicology, Winter 1995 Mike IIyman (Ten Jazz Standards with Jimmy Raney. Jamey Aebersold, JA1230, 1979), it is possible to make some comparative observations. Played at a tempo of roughly 180 bpm, Mike Hyman's ridetap pickup was about 33% of the beat width, unlike Keil's ridetap pickup which, at a similar tempo, was about 25% of the beat width (see Figures 3 and 4). Furthermore, Keil's ridetap was relatively consistent, whereas Hyman's fluctuates. Nor does Hyman always place short taps after beats 2 and 4. Recall also that Keil's ridetap fell consistently ahead of the bass. Hyman's ride tap also falls ahead of the bass on many of the beats shown, except the fourth beat of bars 1 and 19 (see Figures 9 and 10). As we saw above, Keil takes approximately 4 beats to settle into a ridetap-ahead-of-bassline groove. Hyman "catches up" to the bass (if we can