The Feasibility of Virtual VitalTalk Workshops in Japanese: Can Faculty Members in the US Effectively Teach Communication Skills Virtually to Learners in Japan?

The Feasibility of Virtual VitalTalk Workshops in Japanese: Can Faculty Members in the US Effectively Teach Communication Skills Virtually to Learners in Japan?
复制标题

日语中虚拟VitalTalk讲习班的可行性:美国的教职员工能否实际上向日本的学习者教授沟通技巧?

DOI:
10.1177/10499091211044477
复制
发表时间:
2022-07
期刊:
The American journal of hospice & palliative care
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Nakagawa S
Nakagawa S
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ito K;Uemura T;Yuasa M;Onishi E;Shiozawa Y;Ishikawa H;Ouchi K;Nakagawa S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

VitalTalk是美国一个针对严重疾病对话的既定培训计划。以前,这个培训课程是用日语亲自提供的,但从来没有虚拟过。评估在日本虚拟管理VitalTalk研讨会的可行性。我们进行了一个虚拟研讨会,其中包括2天(每天3小时)的同步会议和异步模块之前。美国的五名VitalTalk教师为来自日本33家机构的48名医生举办了4次研讨会。学员在讲习班前后完成了调查。为了评估可行性,学习者被要求对研讨会和虚拟格式的满意度作为主要成果,他们在严重疾病沟通中的自我评估准备作为次要成果。每个问题采用5分Likert量表。所有学习者(n = 48,男性79%)参加了调查。所有问题的学习者满意度平均分均为4.69或更高。在所有问题中,虚拟格式的满意度平均得分为4.33或更高。工作坊前11个问题的自我报告准备平均得分在2.30 - 3.34之间,工作坊后均显著增加至3.08 - 3.96(所有问题p < 0.01)。日本的学习者对我们的VitalTalk研讨会的虚拟形式感到满意,他们自我报告的准备情况在研讨会后显著改善。VitalTalk在美国的教职员工能够为日本的医生提供虚拟沟通培训。
VitalTalk is an established training program for serious illness conversations in the US. Previously, this training course has been provided in-person in Japanese, but never virtually. To evaluate the feasibility of a virtually administered VitalTalk workshop in Japanese. We conducted a virtual workshop which consisted of 2 days (3 hours per day) of synchronous sessions and preceding asynchronous modules. Five VitalTalk faculty members in the US facilitated 4 workshops for 48 physicians from 33 institutions across Japan. Learners completed surveys before and after the workshop. To evaluate the feasibility, learners were asked for their satisfaction with the workshop and the virtual format as primary outcomes and their self-assessed preparedness in serious illness communication as the secondary outcome. Each question employed a 5-point Likert scale. All learners (n = 48, male 79%) participated in the survey. The mean score of the learners’ satisfaction was 4.69 or higher in all questions. The mean score of the virtual format’s satisfaction was 4.33 or higher in all questions. The mean score of self-reported preparedness on the 11 questions were between 2.30 and 3.34 before the workshop, all of which significantly increased to 3.08 through 3.96 after the workshop (p < 0.01 in all questions). Learners in Japan perceived the virtual format of our VitalTalk workshop as satisfactory, and their self-reported preparedness improved significantly after the workshop. VitalTalk faculty members in the US were able to provide virtual communication training to physicians in Japan.
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15709
发表时间: 2019-05-01
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Back, Anthony L.;Fromme, Erik K.;Meier, Diane E.
通讯作者: Meier, Diane E.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000993
发表时间: 2016-06-01
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Grudzen, Corita R.;Emlet, Lillian L.;Arnold, Robert
通讯作者: Arnold, Robert
DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.55.3.164
发表时间: 2005-05-01
影响因子: 254.7
作者:
Back, AL;Arnold, RM;Fryer-Edwards, K
通讯作者: Fryer-Edwards, K
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302
发表时间: 2000-01-01
期刊: The oncologist
影响因子: --
作者:
Baile, W F;Buckman, R;Kudelka, A P
通讯作者: Kudelka, A P
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.035
发表时间: 2021-08
影响因子: 4.7
作者:
Onishi E;Nakagawa S;Uemura T;Shiozawa Y;Yuasa M;Ito K;Kobayashi Y;Ishikawa H;Ouchi K
通讯作者: Ouchi K