On Really Believing
On Really Believing
复制标题
论真正相信
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Phillips
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Phillips
在当代宗教哲学中，人们普遍认为，如果一个哲学家希望对宗教信仰进行分析，试图澄清这种信仰的语法，他必须在实在论和非实在论之间做出选择。人们认为，这些是他唯一的哲学选择。根据特伦斯·佩内尔胡姆（Terence Penelhum）的说法，“大多数无神论者和不可知论者都是神学现实主义者，显然大多数信仰的捍卫者和辩护者也是。[1]大多数，但不是全部，因为据说，在信仰和不信仰之争的边缘，是那些哲学家和神学家，他们对这些选择给出了非现实主义的解释。现实主义者认为，非现实主义的分析未能抓住信仰和无神论的本质。
It is widely assumed in contemporary philosophy of religion that if a philosopher wishes to give an analytic account of religious belief, one which seeks to clarify the grammar of that belief, he must choose between realism and non-realism. These, it is thought, are the only philosophical alternatives open to him. According to Terence Penelhum, ‘Most atheists and agnostics are theological realists, and obviously most defenders and apologists for faith are also.’1 Most, but not all, for, it is said, on the margins of the dispute between belief and unbelief are those philosophers and theologians who give non-realist accounts of these alternatives. According to realists, the non-realist analyses fail to capture the essence of belief and atheism.