An organized anarchy? Understanding the role of German cooperation in the construction and export of the dual training model
An organized anarchy? Understanding the role of German cooperation in the construction and export of the dual training model
复制标题
有组织的无政府状态？
DOI：
10.1111/ijtd.12274
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Fontdevila C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fontdevila C
德国的合作作为在全球范围内传播双重培训的关键力量的作用在专业文献中得到了很好的确立。德国合作的多层次性和分散性表明，德国在这一领域的努力遵循一个复杂的和不断变化的相互作用的动机，但德国在技术和职业教育与培训（TVET）领域的双边工作背后的原理很少被系统地审查。此外，经济学和国际关系学提供的援助动机问题的现有方法似乎不适合理解德国TVET合作努力背后的理由。本文结合文件分析和与主要利益相关者的访谈，探讨了德国在推广和出口双重培训模式方面的合作努力背后的驱动因素和动机的异质性，并探讨了这种多样性所带来的协调挑战。本文发现，德国在国际上促进双重培训的努力是由至少三个分析上不同的理由，大致对应于德国政策空间内的三个不同的极点，即经济，发展和教育领域。该文件还发现，这种多样性的动机提出了重要的协调挑战，而最近的协调工作已经成功地确保一定程度的修辞一致性，只有有限的进展方面取得了行动的一致性。
The role of German cooperation as a key force behind the worldwide dissemination of dual training is well‐established within the specialized literature. The multilayered and fragmented nature of the German cooperation landscape suggests that German efforts in this area follow a complex and evolving interplay of motivations—yet the rationales behind Germany's bilateral work in the area of technical and vocational education and training (TVET) have rarely been examined in a systematic way. Additionally, existing approaches to the question of aid motivations as provided by economics and international relations scholarship appear to be ill‐suited to understanding the rationales behind Germany's TVET cooperation efforts. Drawing on a combination of document analysis and interviews with key stakeholders, this paper investigates the heterogeneity of drivers and motivations behind German cooperation efforts in the promotion and export of the dual training model and examines the coordination challenges posed by this diversity. The paper finds that German efforts in the international promotion of dual training are driven by at least three analytically distinct rationales that correspond roughly to three differentiated poles within the German policy space—namely, the economic, development and education arenas. The paper also finds that this diversity of motivations poses important coordination challenges—and that, while recent coordination efforts have succeeded in securing some degree of rhetorical consistency, only limited progress has been made in terms of operational coherence.