A POMS short form for cancer patients: Psychometric and structural evaluation

A POMS short form for cancer patients: Psychometric and structural evaluation
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/pon.564
复制
发表时间:
2002-07-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Dudley, WN
Dudley, WN
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Baker, F;Denniston, M;Dudley, WN

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

采用Shacham缩短版(37项)的65项心境状态量表(POMS),对428例等待骨髓移植的癌症患者进行了内部一致性、效度和因子结构检验。Cronbach的α值范围从0.78到0.91的POMS短形式(POMS-SF)的6个分量表和总的37个项目的规模。与CES-D、自评Karnofsky、MOS SF-20身体功能和Bradburn积极和消极情感量表的相关性提供了POMS-SF收敛和判别效度的证据。验证性因素分析的结果支持POMS的37个项目的版本中的POMS项目的6个因素的解释。版权所有(C)2002约翰威利父子有限公司
The internal consistency, validity, and factor structure of the Shacham shortened version (37 items) of the 65-item profile of mood states (POMS) were examined with a sample of 428 cancer patients who were awaiting bone marrow transplantation. Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.78 to 0.91 were obtained for each of the six subscales of the POMS-short form (POMS-SF) and for the total 37-item scale. Correlations with the CES-D, the Self-Rated Karnofsky, the MOS SF-20 Physical Functioning, and the Bradburn Positive and Negative Affect Scales provided evidence of the convergent and discriminant validity of the POMS-SF. Results of a confirmatory factor analysis were supportive of the 6-factor interpretation of the POMS items in the 37-item version of the POMS. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.