Weight loss and lipid changes with low-energy diets: Comparator study of milk-based versus soy-based liquid meal replacement interventions

Weight loss and lipid changes with low-energy diets: Comparator study of milk-based versus soy-based liquid meal replacement interventions
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/07315724.2005.10719467
复制
发表时间:
2005-06-01
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Hoie, LH
Hoie, LH
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Anderson, JW;Hoie, LH

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:大豆蛋白摄入对实验动物的体重和脂肪分布有有利的影响,但这些影响尚未在人类身上得到证实。为了比较大豆代餐 (MR) 与牛奶代餐 (MR) 的效果,我们评估了食用低能量饮食 (LED)(包括牛奶或大豆 MR)的肥胖受试者的体重减轻和血清脂蛋白变化。方法:超重或肥胖女性和男性(体重指数 27-40 kg/m(2))被随机分配到提供 1200 kcal/天的 LED,摄入 5 种或 2 种大豆代餐。 牛奶液体 MR 进行为期 12 周的减肥试验。在基线、第 6 周和第 12 周获得血清脂蛋白测量结果。结果:对于大豆和牛奶 MR 组,受试者数量分别为 51 名和 39 名随机受试者以及 30 名和 22 名完成者。 MR 平均使用量:大豆,3.7 次/天;和牛奶,1.9/天。 12 周时完成者的体重减轻为: 大豆 MR,初始体重的 9.0%(95% 置信区间,7.3-10.6%);和牛奶 MR 分别为 7.9% (5.8-8.8%),无显着差异。六周时,大豆 MR(15.2% 和 17.4%)的血清胆固醇和 LDL-胆固醇值相对于基线的降低分别显着高于(P < 0.015)牛奶 MR(7.9% 和 7.7%)。使用大豆 MR 与第 6 周和 12 周时血清甘油三酯的显着降低相关,而使用牛奶 MR 则不然。结论:作为低能量饮食的一部分,使用大豆 MR 在 12 周内与使用牛奶 MR 相比,体重减轻略有但不显着。这些观察结果证实了之前的研究记录了 MR 用于减肥的有效性。
Objectives: Soy protein intake has favorable effects on body weight and fat distribution in experimental animals but these effects have not been demonstrated in humans. To compare effects of soy- vs. milk-based meal replacements (MR) we assessed weight loss and serum lipoproteins changes for obese subjects who consumed low-energy diets (LED) including either milk-based or soy-based MR.Methods: Overweight or obese women and men (body mass indices 27-40 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned to LED providing 1200 kcal/day, with consumption of five soy-based or two milk-based liquid MR for a 12-week weight loss trial. Serum lipoprotein measurements were obtained at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks.Results: For soy and milk MR groups, subject numbers were, respectively, 51 and 39 randomized and 30 and 22 completers. MR use averaged: soy, 3.7/day; and milk, 1.9/day. Weight losses for completers at 12 weeks were: soy MR, 9.0% of initial body weight (95% confidence intervals, 7.3-10.6%); and milk MR, 7.9% (5.8-8.8%) with no significant differences. Reductions from baseline in serum cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol values, respectively, at six weeks were significantly greater (P < 0.015) with soy MR (15.2% and 17.4%) than with milk MR (7.9% and 7.7%). Soy MR use was associated with significant reductions in serum triglycerides at 6 and 12 weeks while milk MR use was not.Conclusions: Soy MR use, as part of a low-energy diet, was associated with slightly but not significantly greater weight loss over a 12-week period than milk MR use. These observations confirm previous studies documenting the effectiveness of MR use for weight loss.