Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities
Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s1049096512000819
复制
发表时间：
2012-10-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Fujii, Lee Ann
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fujii, Lee Ann
政治学对程序伦理的强调导致了研究者从设计到出版阶段应该如何考虑和对待研究参与者的忽视。本文纠正了这一疏忽，并呼吁在整个学科的研究伦理的持续讨论。这篇文章的核心论点是双重的：道德应该对每个人都很重要，而不仅仅是那些在该领域花费大量时间的人;道德是一项持续的责任，而不是一项可以从“待办事项”列表中勾选的离散任务。伦理问题在所有类型的政治科学研究中都很重要，因为大多数政治科学都涉及“人类主体”。政治科学研究的生产者和消费者需要考虑研究伦理的模糊和经常令人不安的维度，以免我们创造一个“不道德”的学科，或者更糟的是，不道德的。
The emphasis in political science on procedural ethics has led to a neglect of how researchers should consider and treat study participants, from design to publication stage. This article corrects this oversight and calls for a sustained discussion of research ethics across the discipline. The article's core argument is twofold: that ethics should matter to everyone, not just those who spend extended time in the field; and that ethics is an ongoing responsibility, not a discrete task to be checked off a "to do" list. Ethics matter in all types of political science research because most political science involves "human subjects." Producers and consumers of political science research need to contemplate the ambiguous and oftentimes uncomfortable dimensions of research ethics, lest we create a discipline that is "nonethical," or worse, unethical.