Patient self-appraisal of change and minimal clinically important difference on the European organization for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 before and during cancer therapy.
Patient self-appraisal of change and minimal clinically important difference on the European organization for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 before and during cancer therapy.
复制标题
欧洲研究和治疗癌症生活质量调查表Core 30和治疗癌症治疗之前和期间,患者的变化和最小临床上的临床差异很小。
DOI:
10.1186/1471-2407-13-165
复制
发表时间:
2013-03-28
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Berry DL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hong F;Bosco JL;Bush N;Berry DL
Clinical interpretation of health related quality of life (HRQOL) scores is challenging. The purpose of this analysis was to interpret score changes and identify minimal clinically important differences (MCID) on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) before (T1) and during (T2) cancer treatment. Patients (N = 627) in stem cell transplant (SCT) and medical (MED) or radiation (RAD) oncology at two comprehensive cancer centers, enrolled in the Electronic Self-Report Assessment-Cancer study and completed the QLQ-C30 at T1 and T2. Perceived changes in five QOL domains, physical (PF), emotional (EF), social (SF), cognitive functioning (CF) and global quality of life (QOL), were reported using the Subject Significance Questionnaire (SSQ) at T2. Anchored on SSQ ratings indicating “improvement”, “the same”, or “deterioration”, means and effect sizes were calculated for QLQ-C30 score changes. MCID was calculated as the mean difference in QLQ-C30 score changes reflecting one category change on SSQ rating, using a two-piece linear regression model. A majority of SCT patients (54%) perceived deteriorating global HRQOL versus improvement (17%), while approximately equal proportions of MED/RAD patients perceived improvement (25%) and deterioration (26%). Global QOL decreased 14.2 (SCT) and 2.0 (MED/RAD) units, respectively, among patients reporting “the same” in the SSQ. The MCID ranged 5.7-11.4 (SCT) and 7.2-11.8 (MED/RAD) units among patients reporting deteriorated HRQOL; ranged 2.7-3.4 units among MED/RAD patients reporting improvement. Excepting for the global QOL (MCID =6.9), no meaningful MCID was identified among SCT patients reporting improvement. Cancer treatment has greater impact on HRQOL among SCT patients than MED/RAD patients. The MCID for QLQ-C30 score change differed across domains, and differed for perceived improvement and deterioration, suggesting different standards for self-evaluating changes in HRQOL during cancer treatment. Specifically, clinical attention can be focused on patients who report at least a 6 point decrease, and for patients who report at least a 3 point increase on QLQ-C30 domains. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00852852
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Kvam, Ann Kristin;Fayers, Peter M.;Wisloff, Finn
通讯作者:
Wisloff, Finn
影响因子:
6.2
作者:
Ringash, Jolie;O'Sullivan, Brian;Redelmeier, Donald A.
通讯作者:
Redelmeier, Donald A.
DOI:
10.1093/jnci/85.5.365
发表时间:
1993-03-03
期刊:
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
影响因子:
--
作者:
AARONSON, NK;AHMEDZAI, S;TAKEDA, F
通讯作者:
TAKEDA, F
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
King, MT
通讯作者:
King, MT
DOI:
10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
发表时间:
1989-12-01
期刊:
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS
影响因子:
--
作者:
JAESCHKE, R;SINGER, J;GUYATT, GH
通讯作者:
GUYATT, GH