At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict
At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict
复制标题
战争结束时：内战后建设和平
DOI：
10.1177/002234330504200321
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Clionadh Raleigh
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Clionadh Raleigh
杰出且相当资深的经济学家——在书的最后。他们的首要任务往往是快速解决问题，而这些问题至少在一定程度上可能是由其他挑战引起的。更重要的是，小组成员倾向于忽视作者收集的一些证据。人们对科利尔与霍夫勒（Collier & Hoeffler）关于武装冲突的精彩章节的反应表明，诺贝尔奖并不能防止偏见。该小组的一位成员驳斥了牛津经济学家分析的战争的经济根源，并指出自由贸易是主要的安抚力量，而另一位著名的小组成员则提到种族或宗教仇恨是冲突的根源。杰拉尔德·施耐德
of distinguished and rather senior economists – makes at the end of the book. Their priorities tend to be quick-fixes of problems that might, at least partly, be caused by some other challenge. More importantly, the panellists tend to disregard some of the evidence assembled by the authors. The reactions to the excellent chapter on armed conflict by Collier & Hoeffler illustrate that Nobel awards are no protection against bias. One member of the panel dismisses the economic sources of war that the Oxford economists analyse and points out that free trade is the main pacifying force, while another famous panellist mentions ethnic or religious hatred as a source of conflict. Gerald Schneider