Barriers to Political Analysis in Aid Bureaucracies: From Principle to Practice in DFID and the World Bank
Barriers to Political Analysis in Aid Bureaucracies: From Principle to Practice in DFID and the World Bank
复制标题
援助官僚机构中政治分析的障碍：从原则到英国国际发展部和世界银行的实践
DOI：
10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.009
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
6.9
通讯作者：
D. Hulme
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Yanguas;D. Hulme
政治已成为发展讨论中的一个核心关切问题，但利用政治分析作为提高援助实效的手段仍然有限，在发展机构内部也存在争议。本文使用定性数据从两个治理“领导者”-英国国际发展部和世界银行-分析所面临的行政障碍，在援助官僚政治分析的制度化。我们发现，总部和国家办事处的规划、管理和培训实践基本上没有受到政治分析议程的影响，而政治分析议程因其与小型跨国治理专业人员网络的认同而受到影响。
Politics has become a central concern in development discourse, and yet the use of political analysis as a means for greater aid effectiveness remains limited and contested within development agencies. This article uses qualitative data from two governance “leaders” – the United Kingdom Department for International Development and the World Bank – to analyze the administrative hurdles facing the institutionalization of political analysis in aid bureaucracies. We find that programing, management, and training practices across headquarters and country offices remain largely untouched by a political analysis agenda which suffers from its identification with a small cross-national network of governance professionals.