'Show me, don't tell me'; is this a good approach for rehabilitation?
'Show me, don't tell me'; is this a good approach for rehabilitation?
复制标题
“告诉我，不要告诉我”；
DOI：
10.1177/0269215508091874
复制
发表时间：
2008
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
J. Mcdowd
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Nadar;J. Mcdowd
目的：评估受试者执行任务(SPT)和实验者执行任务(EPT)编码方法在康复环境中可能的记忆优势。设计：对照准实验研究。环境：大学研究实验室和社区环境。研究对象：18名中风幸存者和18名年龄、教育程度和性别匹配的对照组。干预：参与者被指示通过阅读、表演或观察其他人执行任务来学习三个包含20个动作短语的清单，以便稍后进行记忆评估。主要测量：词组学习完成后，进行口头和书面记忆测试，并记录回答。结果：卒中存活者和对照组在SPT方法(Mean(SD)7.952.7)和EPT方法(Mean(SD)7.952.5)下的记忆成绩明显好于基线言语任务法(Mean(SD4.2，1.9)，P<；0.001 ANOVA)。参与者对功能性任务的记忆力也好于临床任务(P<；0.001方差分析)。结论：采用SPT和EPT方法进行编码的效果明显优于接受口头指令。SPT和EPT的编码方法显示出了希望，治疗师可能会在临床上使用它们来促进中风幸存者的记忆表现。
Objective: To assess the possible memory advantages of the subject-performed task (SPT) and experimenter-performed task (EPT) encoding method in rehabilitation settings. Design: Controlled quasi-experimental trial. Setting: University research laboratory and community setting. Subjects: Eighteen stroke survivors and 18 age-, education- and gender-matched controls. Intervention: Participants were instructed to study three lists of 20 action phrases (such as 'ring the bell') by either reading, performing or observing others perform the tasks for later memory assessment. Main measure: After the phrases had been studied, verbal and written memory tests were implemented and responses were recorded. Results: The memory performance of stroke survivors and control groups was significantly better under the SPT method (mean (SD) 7.95 (2.7)) and EPT method (mean (SD) 7.95 (2.5)) relative to the baseline verbal task method (mean (SD) 4.2 (1.9)), (P<0.001 ANOVA). Participants also remembered functional tasks better than clinical tasks (P<0.001 ANOVA). Conclusion: Encoding by the SPT and EPT methods are significantly more effective than receiving verbal instructions. The SPT and EPT encoding methods show promise and therapists may be able to use them in the clinic to facilitate the memory performance of stroke survivors.