Further Experiences with Scenarios and Checklists
Further Experiences with Scenarios and Checklists
复制标题
场景和清单的进一步经验
DOI：
10.1023/a:1009735805377
复制
发表时间：
1998
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
M. Roper
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
James Miller;M. Wood;M. Roper
软件检查是验证软件文档的最佳方法之一。软件检查是一个复杂的过程，有许多可能的变化，其中大多数很少或根本没有得到评估。本文报告的一个组成部分的检查过程中，检测辅助工具，特别是使用场景或检查表的方法进行评估。评估是通过基于主题的实验，目前是同一假设的三个独立实验之一。本文描述了实验过程，对实验数据进行了分析，并将实验结果与其他实验结果进行了比较。这种复制是广泛支持的结果，从原来的实验，即，场景的方法是上级的检查表的方法，和会议组件的软件检查是不是一个有效的缺陷检测机制。本实验还尝试性地提出了一般学业成绩与个人考察成绩之间的关系，以及会议损失与小组考察成绩之间的关系。
Software inspection is one of the best methods of verifying software documents. Software inspection is a complex process, with many possible variations, most of which have received little or no evaluation. This paper reports on the evaluation of one component of the inspection process, detection aids, specifically using Scenario or Checklist approaches. The evaluation is by subject-based experimentation, and is currently one of three independent experiments on the same hypothesis. The paper describes the experimental process, the resulting analysis of the experimental data, and attempts to compare the results in this experiment with the other experiments. This replication is broadly supportive of the results from the original experiment, namely, that the Scenario approach is superior to the Checklist approach; and that the meeting component of a software inspection is not an effective defect detection mechanism. This experiment also tentatively proposes additional relationships between general academic performance and individual inspection performance; and between meeting loss and group inspection performance.