Green Space and Health Equity: A Systematic Review on the Potential of Green Space to Reduce Health Disparities.
Green Space and Health Equity: A Systematic Review on the Potential of Green Space to Reduce Health Disparities.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph18052563
复制
发表时间：
2021-03-04
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yoon HV
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rigolon A;Browning MHEM;McAnirlin O;Yoon HV
世界各地的弱势群体，如低收入和种族/族裔少数群体，比包括富人和白人在内的更特权群体的健康状况更差。这种健康差距是世界上一些国家的一个主要公共卫生问题。在这篇系统综述中，我们研究了绿地与弱势群体的身体健康之间是否存在比特权群体更强的联系。我们假设，由于弱势群体往往缺乏其他促进健康的资源，他们更依赖于邻近的绿地，因此绿地对他们的保护作用更强。我们使用首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析（PRISMA）方法，并搜索五个数据库（CINAHL, Cochrane, PubMed， Scopus和Web of Science）来寻找研究社会经济地位（SES）或种族/民族是否会改变绿色空间-健康关联的文章。根据搜索结果，我们确定了90篇符合纳入标准的文章。我们发现社会经济地位较低的人比富裕的人表现出更多的有益影响，特别是在公共绿地/公园而不是绿地覆盖/绿化方面。欧洲的研究表明，与北美的研究相比，社会地位较低的人对社会地位较高的人有更强的保护作用。我们发现不同种族/民族之间绿地的保护作用没有显著差异。总的来说，这些结果表明绿地可能是促进健康公平的工具，并为城市规划者、公园管理者和公共卫生专业人员提供解决健康差距的方法。
Disadvantaged groups worldwide, such as low-income and racially/ethnically minoritized people, experience worse health outcomes than more privileged groups, including wealthier and white people. Such health disparities are a major public health issue in several countries around the world. In this systematic review, we examine whether green space shows stronger associations with physical health for disadvantaged groups than for privileged groups. We hypothesize that disadvantaged groups have stronger protective effects from green space because of their greater dependency on proximate green space, as they tend to lack access to other health-promoting resources. We use the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) method and search five databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) to look for articles that examine whether socioeconomic status (SES) or race/ethnicity modify the green space-health associations. Based on this search, we identify 90 articles meeting our inclusion criteria. We find lower-SES people show more beneficial effects than affluent people, particularly when concerning public green spaces/parks rather than green land covers/greenness. Studies in Europe show stronger protective effects for lower-SES people versus higher-SES people than do studies in North America. We find no notable differences in the protective effects of green space between racial/ethnic groups. Collectively, these results suggest green space might be a tool to advance health equity and provide ways forward for urban planners, parks managers, and public health professionals to address health disparities.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Bai, Hua;Stanis, Sonja A. Wilhelm;Besenyi, Gina M.
通讯作者：
Besenyi, Gina M.
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Boone-Heinonen, Janne;Gordon-Larsen, Penny;Guilkey, David K.;Jacobs, David R., Jr.;Popkin, Barry M.
通讯作者：
Popkin, Barry M.
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
Asri, Aji Kusumaning;Yu, Chia-Pin;Spengler, John D.
通讯作者：
Spengler, John D.
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Agay-Shay, Keren;Peled, Ammatzia;Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
通讯作者：
Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
DOI：
10.7196/samj.6622
发表时间：
2013-03-01
期刊：
SAMJ: South African Medical Journal
影响因子：
--
作者：
Benatar, S
通讯作者：
Benatar, S