Can double gloves improve surgeon-patient barrier efficiency?
Can double gloves improve surgeon-patient barrier efficiency?
复制标题
双层手套可以提高外科医生与患者之间的屏障效率吗？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
影响因子：
0.1
通讯作者：
Abdallah S. AlOmran
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Sadat;I. Al;Mohammed AlBluwi;J. R. Corea;A. Al;Devidas Shriyan;M. Moussa;Dhakheel AlDhakheel;Abdallah S. AlOmran
本研究的目的是比较双手套(DGS)和单手套(SGS)在骨科和创伤手术中预防患者和外科医生之间血液接触的作用。在骨科手术后收集DGS和SGS，测试穿孔的大小、位置和数量。回顾了年龄、性别、手术类型、持续时间和术后伤口感染的医疗记录。数据比较采用t检验，P<；0.05有统计学意义。五百零七次作业产生了1204个DG和830对SG。外手套穿孔220只，内手套穿孔39只，占10.7%。SGS组发现穿孔226例(13.3%)。双指示器手套内手套穿孔的发生率为1.6%(P<；0.001)。在手术过程中，DGS的穿孔发生率为67%，而SGS为12%(P<；0.005)。这项研究证实，DGs在患者和外科医生之间形成了一道有效的屏障。
The aim of this study was to compare double gloves (DGs) with single gloves (SGs) during orthopedic and trauma surgery in prevention of blood contact between patients and surgeons. DGs and SGs were collected after orthopedic operations, tested for size, site, and number of perforations. Medical records were reviewed for age, sex, type of operation, duration, and postoperative wound infection. Data were compared using t-test with level of statistical significance at P < 0.05. Five hundred seven operations yielded 1204 DGs and 830 pairs SGs. In DGs, perforations were detected in 220 outer glove and 39 inner glove (10.7%). In SGs, 226 perforations were detected (13.3%). The incidence of perforations in inner gloves of the double indicator glove was 1.6% (P < 0.001). During surgery, perforations were recognized in DGs in 67% compared with 12% in SGs (P < 0.005). This study confirms that DGs form an efficient barrier between patients and surgeons.