Differential attrition in health behaviour change trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Differential attrition in health behaviour change trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/08870446.2014.953526
复制
发表时间:
2015-01-02
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Kotz, Daniel
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Crutzen, Rik;Viechtbauer, Wolfgang;Kotz, Daniel
Objective: Attrition is a common problem in health behaviour change (HBC) trials. When the degree of attrition differs between treatment conditions, then this is called differential attrition and is regarded as a major threat to internal validity. The primary research question of this study was: how often and to what degree does differential attrition occur in HBC trials?Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a random selection of HBC trials (k=60). We meta-analysed the relative attrition rates using a random-effects model and examined the relationship between the relative attrition rates and the potential moderators: the amount of human contact in delivery and the intensity of the intervention/control condition, the type of control condition, and the follow-up intensity and duration.Main outcome measures: Relative attrition rates.Results: The average attrition rate was 18% (SD=.15; M=.15) in the intervention and 17% (SD=.13; M=.13) in the control conditions. The estimated average relative attrition rate was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01-1.20, p=.02), suggesting an overall higher attrition rate of 10% in the intervention conditions. This relative attrition rate was not related to any of the potential moderators.Conclusion: There is indication of a slightly higher amount of attrition on average in the intervention conditions of HBC trials.