A critical review of recent US market level health care strategy literature.
A critical review of recent US market level health care strategy literature.
复制标题
对最近美国市场水平医疗保健策略文献的批判性回顾。
DOI：
10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00009-5
复制
发表时间：
2000
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
J. Banaszak
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Wells;J. Banaszak
在这篇评论中，我们认为，这将是有利可图的，如果新古典主义经济理论，主导了最近的美国市场层面的医疗保健战略研究可以补充更多地使用社会学框架。社会学理论可以解决新古典经济学理论倾向于忽视的三个核心问题：（1）决策者的偏好是如何决定的;（2）决策者是谁;（3）决策者的计划如何转化为组织行动。我们提出了五个社会学框架，使研究人员能够更好地解决这些问题，相对于市场层面的战略，在医疗保健。这些框架是（1）制度理论，（2）组织生态学，（3）社会运动，（4）社交网络，（5）内部组织变革。最近的一个全球趋势，对医疗保健提供私有化，使美国市场层面的战略研究越来越适用于非美国读者。
In this review, we argue that it would be profitable if the neoclassical economic theories that have dominated recent US market level health care strategy research could be complemented by greater use of sociological frameworks. Sociological theory can address three central questions that neoclassical economic theories have tended to slight: (1) how decision-makers’ preferences are determined; (2) who the decision-makers are; and (3) how decision-makers’ plans are translated into organizational action. We suggest five sociological frameworks that would enable researchers to address these issues better relative to market level strategy in health care. The frameworks are (1) institutional theory, (2) organizational ecology, (3) social movements, (4) social networks, and (5) internal organizational change. A recent global trend toward privatization of health care provision makes US market level strategy research increasingly applicable to non-US readers.