Simultaneous validation of ten physical activity questionnaires in older men: A doubly labeled water study
Simultaneous validation of ten physical activity questionnaires in older men: A doubly labeled water study
复制标题
DOI：
10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49006.x
复制
发表时间：
2001-01-01
影响因子：
6.3
通讯作者：
Kostka, T
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bonnefoy, M;Normand, S;Kostka, T
目的：本研究的目的是同时验证10个体力活动（PA）问卷在一个同质人群的健康老年男性对参考方法：双标记水（DLW）。设计：横断面研究。设置：以社区为基础的样本从里昂，法国。参与者：19个健康的老人从里昂的各种老年人协会招募的30名老年人（年龄73.4 +/- 4.1岁）同意参加这项研究。将这些测量值（评分）与两个验证测量值（DLW和最大摄氧量（VO 2 max））进行比较。采用DLW方法计算三个参数：（1）总能量消耗（TEE），（2）体力活动水平（PAL），即，TEE与静息代谢率的比值;（3）PA能量消耗。问卷和TEE之间的相关性范围从耶鲁体育活动调查（YPAS）总指数的0.11到斯坦福大学日常活动问卷的0.63。该问卷与PAL（0.75）和VO 2 max（0.62）的相关系数也最好。通过DLW方法测量的TEE也获得了大学校友体育得分、七天回忆中度活动和问卷d 'Activite Physique Saint-Etienne体育活动的显著结果（分别为r = 0.54、r = 0.52和r = 0.54）。绝对有效在组的基础上，通过七天回忆或YPAS和DLW测量的PA之间没有差异。协议的限制是广泛的所有questionnaires.CONCLUSIONS：只有少数问卷表现出合理程度的可靠性，并可用于排名健康的老年男性根据PA。当斯坦福大学日常活动问卷与所有验证措施进行比较时，相关系数最好。报告最近PA、七天回忆和YPAS的两份调查问卷准确地评估了该群体的能量消耗。所有问卷的个体变异性都很高，这表明它们作为个体能量消耗的替代指标可能是有限的。
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to simultaneously validate 10 physical activity (PA) questionnaires in a homogenous population of healthy elderly men against the reference method: doubly labeled water (DLW).DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.SETTING: Community-based sample from Lyon, France.PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen healthy old men (age 73.4 +/- 4.1 years), recruited from various associations for elderly people in Lyon, agreed to participate in the study.MEASUREMENTS: The questionnaire-derived measures (scores) were compared with two validation measures: DLW and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). With the DLW method three parameters were calculated: (1) total energy expenditure (TEE), (2) physical activity level (PAL), i.e., the ratio of TEE to resting metabolic rate, (3) energy expenditure of PA.RESULTS: Relative validity. Correlation between the questionnaires and TEE ranged from 0.11 for the Yale Physical Activity Survey (YPAS) total index to 0.63 for the Stanford usual activity questionnaire. This questionnaire also gave the best correlation coefficients with PAL (0.75), and with VO2max (0.62). Significant results with TEE measured by the DLW method were also obtained for college alumni sports score, Seven Day Recall moderate activity, and Questionnaire d'Activite Physique Saint-Etienne sports activity (r = 0.54, r = 0.52, and r = 0.54, respectively). Absolute validity. No difference was found between PA measured by the Seven Day Recall or by the YPAS and DLW, on a group basis. The limits of agreement were wide for all the questionnaires.CONCLUSIONS: Only a few questionnaires demonstrated a reasonable degree of reliability and could be used to rank healthy older men according to PA. Correlation coefficients were best when the Stanford Usual Activity Questionnaire was compared with all the validation measures. The two questionnaires reporting recent PA, the Seven Day Recall, and YPAS accurately assessed energy expenditure for the group. The individual variability was high for all the questionnaires, suggesting that their use as a proxy measure of individual energy expenditure may be limited.