Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination.
Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104799
复制
发表时间:
2023-10
期刊:
影响因子:
11.1
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
While vaccines have established utility against COVID-19, phase 3 efficacy studies have generally not comprehensively evaluated protection provided by previous infection or hybrid immunity (previous infection plus vaccination). Individual patient data from US government-supported harmonized vaccine trials provide an unprecedented sample population to address this issue. We characterized the protective efficacy of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against COVID-19 early in the pandemic over three-to six-month follow-up and compared with vaccine-associated protection. In this post-hoc cross-protocol analysis of the Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Novavax COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, we allocated participants into four groups based on previous-infection status at enrolment and treatment: no previous infection/placebo; previous infection/placebo; no previous infection/vaccine; and previous infection/vaccine. The main outcome was RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 >7–15 days (per original protocols) after final study injection. We calculated crude and adjusted efficacy measures. Previous infection/placebo participants had a 92% decreased risk of future COVID-19 compared to no previous infection/placebo participants (overall hazard ratio [HR] ratio: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05–0.13). Among single-dose Janssen participants, hybrid immunity conferred greater protection than vaccine alone (HR: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.01–0.10). Too few infections were observed to draw statistical inferences comparing hybrid immunity to vaccine alone for other trials. Vaccination, previous infection, and hybrid immunity all provided near-complete protection against severe disease. Previous infection, any hybrid immunity, and two-dose vaccination all provided substantial protection against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 through the early Delta period. Thus, as a surrogate for natural infection, vaccination remains the safest approach to protection. .
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
56.3
作者:
Hardt, Karin;Vandebosch, An;Sadoff, Jerald;Le Gars, Mathieu;Truyers, Carla;Lowson, David;Van Dromme, Ilse;Vingerhoets, Johan;Kamphuis, Tobias;Scheper, Gert;Ruiz-Guinazu, Javier;Faust, Saul N.;Spinner, Christoph D.;Schuitemaker, Hanneke;Van Hoof, Johan;Douoguih, Macaya;Struyf, Frank
通讯作者:
Struyf, Frank
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa2105290
发表时间:
2021-12-16
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Falsey AR;Sobieszczyk ME;Hirsch I;Sproule S;Robb ML;Corey L;Neuzil KM;Hahn W;Hunt J;Mulligan MJ;McEvoy C;DeJesus E;Hassman M;Little SJ;Pahud BA;Durbin A;Pickrell P;Daar ES;Bush L;Solis J;Carr QO;Oyedele T;Buchbinder S;Cowden J;Vargas SL;Guerreros Benavides A;Call R;Keefer MC;Kirkpatrick BD;Pullman J;Tong T;Brewinski Isaacs M;Benkeser D;Janes HE;Nason MC;Green JA;Kelly EJ;Maaske J;Mueller N;Shoemaker K;Takas T;Marshall RP;Pangalos MN;Villafana T;Gonzalez-Lopez A;AstraZeneca AZD1222 Clinical Study Group
通讯作者:
AstraZeneca AZD1222 Clinical Study Group
影响因子:
2
作者:
Fintzi, Jonathan;Follmann, Dean
通讯作者:
Follmann, Dean
影响因子:
105.7
作者:
Greenland, Sander;Mansournia, Mohammad Ali;Altman, Douglas G.
通讯作者:
Altman, Douglas G.
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa2035389
发表时间:
2021-02-04
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Baden LR;El Sahly HM;Essink B;Kotloff K;Frey S;Novak R;Diemert D;Spector SA;Rouphael N;Creech CB;McGettigan J;Khetan S;Segall N;Solis J;Brosz A;Fierro C;Schwartz H;Neuzil K;Corey L;Gilbert P;Janes H;Follmann D;Marovich M;Mascola J;Polakowski L;Ledgerwood J;Graham BS;Bennett H;Pajon R;Knightly C;Leav B;Deng W;Zhou H;Han S;Ivarsson M;Miller J;Zaks T;COVE Study Group
通讯作者:
COVE Study Group