Dialogues between Academics and Practitioners: The Role of Generative Dialogic Encounters
Dialogues between Academics and Practitioners: The Role of Generative Dialogic Encounters
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0170840610374396
复制
发表时间：
2010-09-01
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
MacLean, Donald
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Beech, Nic;MacIntosh, Robert;MacLean, Donald
在这篇文章中，我们试图展示支撑相关性辩论的思维方面可能会弄巧成拙。我们从对话的角度考虑学者和实践者之间的关系，并对支持相关性的学者撰写研究的方式进行文本分析。我们使用角色分析技术来强调学者和从业者之间不匹配期望的可能性，然后考虑从业者和学者之间的说明性对话，以形成我们的观点，即相关性源于生成性的对话遭遇。我们在组织研究关系的背景下概念化了一种修正的对话观点，我们认为这为共同产生知识和理解提供了一个有用的起点。
In this paper we seek to show how aspects of the thinking underpinning the relevance debate can be self-defeating. We consider the relationship between academics and practitioners from a dialogic perspective and perform a textual analysis of the ways in which 'pro-relevance' academics write about research. We use role analysis techniques to highlight the potential for mismatched expectations between academics and practitioners, and then consider an illustrative dialogue between practitioners and academics to develop our view that relevance has its roots in generative dialogic encounters. We conceptualize a modified view of dialogue in the context of organizational research relationships, which we believe offers a useful starting point for co-production of knowledge and understanding.