Reply to "Comment on 'Theoretical analysis of quantum turbulence using the Onsager ideal turbulence theory'"
Reply to "Comment on 'Theoretical analysis of quantum turbulence using the Onsager ideal turbulence theory'"
复制标题
回复“评论‘使用Onsager理想湍流理论对量子湍流进行理论分析’”
DOI：
10.1103/physreve.105.027102
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Tomohiro Tanogami
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yuka Kataoka;Tomohiro Tanogami
我们驳斥了Krstulovic，L 'vov和Nazarenko [Phys. Rev. E 105，027101（2022）10.1103/PhysRevE.105.027101]对我们的论文[Phys. Rev. E 103，023106（2021）2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.103.023106]的评论中表达的批评。我们首先表明，流通量的量化在我们的分析中并没有被忽略。然后，我们提出了一个更复杂的分析，以避免一个微妙的问题的规律性的速度场。因此，我们捍卫我们的论文的主要结果，它预测的双级联的情况下，量子应力级联遵循理查森级联。我们还对开尔文波级联和量子应力级联之间的关系提出了一个猜想。
We refute the criticism expressed in a Comment by Krstulovic, L'vov, and Nazarenko [Phys. Rev. E 105, 027101 (2022)10.1103/PhysRevE.105.027101] on our paper [Phys. Rev. E 103, 023106 (2021)2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.103.023106]. We first show that quantization of circulation is not ignored in our analysis. Then, we propose a more sophisticated analysis to avoid a subtle problem with the regularity of the velocity field. We thus defend the main results of our paper, which predicts the double-cascade scenario where the quantum stress cascade follows the Richardson cascade. We also provide a conjecture on the relation between the Kelvin-wave cascade and the quantum stress cascade.