Effective and Ineffective Supervision
Effective and Ineffective Supervision
复制标题
有效和无效的监督
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kristin E. Mehr
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nicholas Ladany;Y. Mori;Kristin E. Mehr
虽然监督被认为是一个重要的租户的专业成长咨询和心理治疗的学生，可变的有效性，或无效性，监督已受到审查，在最近的时间。我们的128名参与者样本揭示了最有效的（例如，鼓励自治，加强监督关系，促进公开讨论）和最无效（例如，贬低监督，执行无效的客户概念化和治疗，并削弱监督关系）主管技能，技术和行为。此外，有效和无效的行为，以及沿着最好和最差的主管，显着区分基于工作联盟，主管风格，主管自我披露，被监管者不披露，和被监管者的评价。监管能力和主管问责制的影响进行了讨论。
Although supervision is recognized as a significant tenant of professional growth for counseling and psychotherapy students, the variability of the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of supervision has come under scrutiny in recent times. Our sample of 128 participants shed light on the most effective (e.g., encouraged autonomy, strengthened the supervisory relationship, and facilitated open discussion) and most ineffective (e.g., depreciated supervision, performed ineffective client conceptualization and treatment, and weakened the supervisory relationship) supervisor skills, techniques, and behaviors. Moreover, effective and ineffective behaviors, along with best and worst supervisors, were significantly differentiated based on the supervisory working alliance, supervisor style, supervisor self-disclosure, supervisee nondisclosure, and supervisee evaluation. Implications for supervision competencies and supervisor accountability are discussed.