Bardoxolone methyl in type 2 diabetes and stage 4 chronic kidney disease.

Bardoxolone methyl in type 2 diabetes and stage 4 chronic kidney disease.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa1306033
复制
发表时间:
2013-12-26
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
BEACON Trial Investigators
BEACON Trial Investigators
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
de Zeeuw D;Akizawa T;Audhya P;Bakris GL;Chin M;Christ-Schmidt H;Goldsberry A;Houser M;Krauth M;Lambers Heerspink HJ;McMurray JJ;Meyer CJ;Parving HH;Remuzzi G;Toto RD;Vaziri ND;Wanner C;Wittes J;Wrolstad D;Chertow GM;BEACON Trial Investigators

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

尽管肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂可以减缓糖尿病肾病的进展,但残留风险很高。核1因子(红细胞衍生因子2)相关因子2激活剂是否能进一步降低这种风险尚不清楚。我们随机分配2185名2型糖尿病和4期慢性肾病患者(估计肾小球滤过率[GFR],每分钟每1.73 m2体表面积15至<30 ml),每日剂量为20mg的甲基巴多隆或安慰剂。主要综合结局为终末期肾病(ESRD)或心血管原因死亡。根据独立数据和安全监测委员会的建议,主办方和指导委员会终止了试验;中位随访时间为9个月。1088名随机分配给甲基巴多洛酮组的患者中有69名(6%),1097名随机分配给安慰剂组的患者中有69名(6%)有主要的复合结局(甲基巴多洛酮组与安慰剂组的风险比为0.98;95%可信区间[CI], 0.70 ~ 1.37; P = 0.92)。在巴多洛酮甲基组,43例患者发生ESRD, 27例患者死于心血管原因;在安慰剂组,51名患者发生ESRD, 19名患者死于心血管原因。巴多洛酮甲基组共有96例患者因心力衰竭住院或死于心力衰竭,而安慰剂组为55例(风险比为1.83;95% CI为1.32 ~ 2.55;P<0.001)。与安慰剂组相比,巴多洛酮甲基组估测的GFR、血压和尿白蛋白与肌酐比值显著增加,体重显著下降。在2型糖尿病和4期慢性肾病患者中,甲基巴多洛酮并没有降低ESRD或心血管原因死亡的风险。与安慰剂组相比,甲基巴多洛酮组的心血管事件发生率更高,这促使试验终止。(由Reata制药公司资助;BEACON ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT01351675)
Although inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system can slow the progression of diabetic kidney disease, the residual risk is high. Whether nuclear 1 factor (erythroid-derived 2)–related factor 2 activators further reduce this risk is unknown. We randomly assigned 2185 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stage 4 chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR], 15 to <30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area) to bardoxolone methyl, at a daily dose of 20 mg, or placebo. The primary composite outcome was end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death from cardiovascular causes. The sponsor and the steering committee terminated the trial on the recommendation of the independent data and safety monitoring committee; the median follow-up was 9 months. A total of 69 of 1088 patients (6%) randomly assigned to bardoxolone methyl and 69 of 1097 (6%) randomly assigned to placebo had a primary composite outcome (hazard ratio in the bardoxolone methyl group vs. the placebo group, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.37; P = 0.92). In the bardoxolone methyl group, ESRD developed in 43 patients, and 27 patients died from cardiovascular causes; in the placebo group, ESRD developed in 51 patients, and 19 patients died from cardiovascular causes. A total of 96 patients in the bardoxolone methyl group were hospitalized for heart failure or died from heart failure, as compared with 55 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.32 to 2.55; P<0.001). Estimated GFR, blood pressure, and the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio increased significantly and body weight decreased significantly in the bardoxolone methyl group, as compared with the placebo group. Among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stage 4 chronic kidney disease, bardoxolone methyl did not reduce the risk of ESRD or death from cardiovascular causes. A higher rate of cardiovascular events with bardoxolone methyl than with placebo prompted termination of the trial. (Funded by Reata Pharmaceuticals; BEACON ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01351675.)