A comparative analysis of the results from 4 trials of β-blocker therapy for heart failure:: BEST, CIBIS-II, MERIT-HF, and COPERNICUS
A comparative analysis of the results from 4 trials of β-blocker therapy for heart failure:: BEST, CIBIS-II, MERIT-HF, and COPERNICUS
复制标题
DOI:
10.1054/s1071-9164(03)00133-7
复制
发表时间:
2003-10-01
影响因子:
6
通讯作者:
Eichhorn, E
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Domanski, MJ;Krause-Steinrauf, H;Eichhorn, E
Background: Recent large randomized, controlled trials (BEST [beta-blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial], CIBIS-II [Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Trial II], COPERNICUS [Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival Study], and MERIT-HF [Metoprolol Randomized Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure]) have addressed the usefulness of beta-blockade in the treatment of advanced heart failure. CIBIS-II, COPERNICUS, and MERIT-HF have shown that beta-blocker treatment with bisoprolol, carvedilol, and metoprolol XL, respectively, reduce mortality in advanced heart failure patients, whereas BEST found a statistically nonsignificant trend toward reduced mortality with bucindolol. We conducted a post hoc analysis to determine whether the response to beta-blockade in BEST could be related to differences in the clinical and demographic characteristics of the study populations. We generated a sample from BEST to resemble the patient cohorts studied in CIBIS-II and MERIT-HF to find out whether the response to beta-blocker therapy was similar to that reported in the other trials. These findings are further compared with COPERNICUS, which entered patients with more severe heart failure.Methods: To achieve conformity with the entry criteria for CIBIS-II and MERIT-HF, the BEST study population was adjusted to exclude patients with systolic blood pressure