A comparative analysis of the results from 4 trials of β-blocker therapy for heart failure:: BEST, CIBIS-II, MERIT-HF, and COPERNICUS

A comparative analysis of the results from 4 trials of β-blocker therapy for heart failure:: BEST, CIBIS-II, MERIT-HF, and COPERNICUS
复制标题

DOI:
10.1054/s1071-9164(03)00133-7
复制
发表时间:
2003-10-01
影响因子:
6
通讯作者:
Eichhorn, E
Eichhorn, E
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Domanski, MJ;Krause-Steinrauf, H;Eichhorn, E

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:最近的大型随机对照试验(BEST [β受体阻滞剂生存评估试验],CIBIS-II[心功能不全比索洛尔试验II], COPERNICUS[卡维地洛前瞻性随机累积生存研究]和mert - hf[美托洛尔随机干预充血性心力衰竭试验])已经解决了β受体阻滞剂治疗晚期心力衰竭的有效性。CIBIS-II、COPERNICUS和MERIT-HF研究表明,β受体阻滞剂分别应用比索洛尔、卡维地洛和美托洛尔XL可降低晚期心力衰竭患者的死亡率,而BEST研究发现布辛多洛降低死亡率的趋势在统计学上不显著。我们进行了一项事后分析,以确定BEST对β -阻断剂的反应是否与研究人群的临床和人口统计学特征的差异有关。我们从BEST中提取了一个样本,与CIBIS-II和MERIT-HF研究的患者队列相似,以确定对β受体阻滞剂治疗的反应是否与其他试验中报道的相似。这些结果进一步与COPERNICUS进行了比较,COPERNICUS进入了更严重的心力衰竭患者。方法:为了符合CIBIS-II和MERIT-HF的入组标准,对BEST研究人群进行了调整,排除了有收缩压的患者
Background: Recent large randomized, controlled trials (BEST [beta-blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial], CIBIS-II [Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Trial II], COPERNICUS [Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival Study], and MERIT-HF [Metoprolol Randomized Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure]) have addressed the usefulness of beta-blockade in the treatment of advanced heart failure. CIBIS-II, COPERNICUS, and MERIT-HF have shown that beta-blocker treatment with bisoprolol, carvedilol, and metoprolol XL, respectively, reduce mortality in advanced heart failure patients, whereas BEST found a statistically nonsignificant trend toward reduced mortality with bucindolol. We conducted a post hoc analysis to determine whether the response to beta-blockade in BEST could be related to differences in the clinical and demographic characteristics of the study populations. We generated a sample from BEST to resemble the patient cohorts studied in CIBIS-II and MERIT-HF to find out whether the response to beta-blocker therapy was similar to that reported in the other trials. These findings are further compared with COPERNICUS, which entered patients with more severe heart failure.Methods: To achieve conformity with the entry criteria for CIBIS-II and MERIT-HF, the BEST study population was adjusted to exclude patients with systolic blood pressure