Residents' perceptions of sustainable drainage systems as highly functional blue green infrastructure
Residents' perceptions of sustainable drainage systems as highly functional blue green infrastructure
复制标题
居民将可持续排水系统视为功能强大的蓝绿色基础设施
DOI：
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103610
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
9.1
通讯作者：
Williams J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Williams J
在英国，用于雨水管理的蓝绿色基础设施被认为是可持续排水系统（SuDS）的一部分。设计指南建议在开发中嵌入源控制和处理流程。这意味着居民居住在sud旁边，发挥渗透、运输和储存等功能。除了水力衰减外，SuDS还可以改善水质，改善野生动物栖息地和舒适性。然而，最大化开发机会的经济压力意味着设计并不总是最大化这些好处。因此，居民对与sud一起生活的好处和问题的看法很重要，因为这些可能会影响住宅物业的价值和支付管理费的意愿，这可能证明高质量的设计具有多重好处。本研究旨在通过对英格兰六个住房开发项目中与sud一起生活的居民的调查来调查这些问题，收集了406/2916份回复。这些发展项目拥有优质的住宅物业，拥有固定的居住人口和活跃的房屋市场。居民对SuDS的存在和功能有不同程度的认识。总的来说，居民们喜欢野生动物和绿地，但对害虫（老鼠和蚊子）和垃圾的担忧缓和了这一点。供水系统的维护也是一个问题，在三个地点，居民被收取管理费，这是不太清楚的，引起了关注。大多数居民都不愿意为房屋的维护付出更多的钱。大多数居民和当地房地产经纪人没有意识到SuDS增加了房地产价值。提高对水处理系统好处的认识可能会使居民更容易接受水处理系统，并鼓励开发商将其纳入开发项目，这可能有助于克服更广泛实施水处理系统的一个障碍。
Blue-green infrastructure for storm water management in the UK is considered to be part of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS). Design guidance recommends that source control and treatment trains are embedded within developments. This means that residents live next to SuDS performing functions such as infiltration, conveyance and storage. In addition to hydraulic attenuation, SuDS can provide benefits such as water quality improvement, wildlife habitat and amenity. However, economic pressure to maximise development opportunity means that designs do not always maximise these benefits. Therefore, residents’ perceptions of the benefits and problems of living with SuDS are important as these may affect residential property values and willingness to pay management fees, which could justify high quality designs that deliver multiple benefits. This study aimed to investigate these issues through a survey of residents living with SuDS across six housing developments in England, 406/2916 responses were collected. The developments had good quality SuDS, with an established residential population and active housing market. The residents had varied levels of awareness of the presence and function of SuDS. Generally, residents liked the wildlife and green space but this was tempered with concerns over pests (rats and mosquitoes) and litter. Maintenance of SuDS was also an issue and at three sites residents were charged management fees which were not well understood and caused concern. The majority of residents were unwilling to contribute more to maintenance. Most residents and local estate agents did not perceive that SuDS increased property values. Raising awareness of the benefits of SuDS may lead to greater acceptance by residents and encourage developers to include them in developments, which could contribute to overcoming one of the barriers to wider implementation.