The 'New' national development planning and global development goals: Processes and partnerships
The 'New' national development planning and global development goals: Processes and partnerships
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.013
复制
发表时间：
2019-08-01
影响因子：
6.9
通讯作者：
Munro, Lauchlan T.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chimhowu, Admos O.;Hulme, David;Munro, Lauchlan T.
拥有国家发展计划的国家数量增加了一倍多，从2006年的62个增加到2018年的134个。现在，全球80%以上的人口生活在一个拥有某种形式的国家发展计划的国家。这种做法在上世纪80年代和90年代曾被认为是指导经济和国家主导发展的遗物，但现在却令人震惊地恢复了。有几个因素促进了这种重新出现，但从2015年左右开始，制定计划的势头加快了，部分原因是需要为可持续发展目标（SDG）制定计划。基于对107个国家发展计划的分析，并借鉴10个案例研究国家的见解，本文分析了“新”国家发展规划，并确定了计划的类型和内容，以及它们对可持续发展议程的影响。本文对新的国家计划进行了分类，分析了它们的特点，并探讨了新的国家发展规划和可持续发展目标可能相互作用的方式。该研究发现，对计划生产过程的所有权和政治控制更大。审计委员会还发现，这些计划在以下方面存在差异：所使用的证据、同一计划不同部分之间的内部一致性程度、制定计划的过程（包容性或精英驱动），以及计划在多大程度上明确说明将如何供资。与20世纪的国家发展计划相比，新一代计划往往以合作理性理论为基础，而不是线性理性。新一代的国家计划被学术研究人员所忽视，值得进行更深入的研究，特别是了解其实施如何促进可持续发展目标的实现。(C)2019年，任作家。由爱思唯尔有限公司出版。这是一篇开放获取的文章，使用CC BY许可证（http：//creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/）。
The number of countries with a national development plan has more than doubled, from about 62 in 2006 to 134 in 2018. More than 80 per cent of the global population now lives in a country with a national development plan of one form or another. This is a stunning recovery of a practice that had been discredited in the 1980s and 1990s as a relic of directed economies and state-led development. Several factors have fostered this re-emergence but from about 2015 the momentum for producing plans has accelerated, driven in part by a need to plan for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Based on an analysis of 107 national development plans, and drawing insights from 10 case study countries, this paper analyses 'new' national development planning and identifies the types and content of the plans, and their implications for the sustainable development agenda. The paper generates a typology of the new national plans, analyses their characteristics and explores the ways in which the new national development planning and the SDGs may interact. The study finds greater ownership and political control of the processes leading to plan production. It also finds that the plans vary in terms of the evidence used, the degree of internal consistency between different parts of the same plan, the process of developing the plan (inclusive or elite-driven), and the extent to which they are clear on how they will be financed. In contrast to 20th-century national development plans the new-generation plans are often underpinned by theories of collaborative rationality rather than by linear rationality. This new generation of national plans has been neglected by academic researchers and merits much greater examination, especially to understand the ways in which their implementation can enhance the achievement of the SDGs. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).