Worst-case versus average-case design for estimation from partial pairwise comparisons
Worst-case versus average-case design for estimation from partial pairwise comparisons
复制标题
DOI:
10.1214/19-aos1838
复制
发表时间:
2020-04
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
A. Pananjady;Cheng Mao;Vidya Muthukumar;M. Wainwright;T. Courtade
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Pananjady;Cheng Mao;Vidya Muthukumar;M. Wainwright;T. Courtade
Pairwise comparison data arises in many domains, including tournament rankings, web search, and preference elicitation. Given noisy comparisons of a fixed subset of pairs of items, we study the problem of estimating the underlying comparison probabilities under the assumption of strong stochastic transitivity (SST). We also consider the noisy sorting subclass of the SST model. We show that when the assignment of items to the topology is arbitrary, these permutationbased models, unlike their parametric counterparts, do not admit consistent estimation for most comparison topologies used in practice. We then demonstrate that consistent estimation is possible when the assignment of items to the topology is randomized, thus establishing a dichotomy between worst-case and average-case designs. We propose two computationally efficient estimators in the average-case setting and analyze their risk, showing that it depends on the comparison topology only through the degree sequence of the topology. We also provide explicit classes of graphs for which the rates achieved by these estimators are optimal. Our results are corroborated by simulations on multiple comparison topologies.