The prevalence of sexual assault against people who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual in the United States: a systematic review.
The prevalence of sexual assault against people who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual in the United States: a systematic review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1524838010390707
复制
发表时间：
2011-04
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Baughman AL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rothman EF;Exner D;Baughman AL
本文系统地回顾了75项研究，研究了美国男同性恋或双性恋（GB）男性和女同性恋或双性恋（LB）女性性侵犯受害的流行情况。所有研究都是在1989年至2009年之间发表的，并报告了定量研究的结果。作者回顾了终生性侵犯受害（LSA）的报告流行率，以及可用的儿童性侵犯（CSA），成人性侵犯（阿萨），亲密伴侣性侵犯（IPSA）和仇恨犯罪相关性侵犯（HC）。这些研究分为使用概率或普查抽样技术（n=25）和使用非概率或“基于社区”的抽样技术（n=50）。共有139，635名GLB受访者参与了审查的基础研究。LB女性的LSA患病率估计值范围为15.6-85.0%，GB男性为11.8-54.0%。考虑到来自集体研究的中位数估计，LB女性比GB男性更容易报告CSA，阿萨，LSA和IPSA，而GB男性比LB女性更容易报告HC。在所有研究中，报告的最高估计值为LB女性的LSA（85%），LB女性的CSA（76.0%）和GB男性的CSA（59.2%）。除了一些例外，使用非概率抽样的研究报告的性攻击发生率高于基于人口的研究或人口普查抽样研究。评估GLB人群的性侵犯受害的挑战进行了讨论，以及对实践，政策和未来的研究的影响。
This article systematically reviews 75 studies that examine the prevalence of sexual assault victimization among gay or bisexual (GB) men, and lesbian or bisexual (LB) women, in the United States. All studies were published between 1989 and 2009 and report the results of quantitative research. The authors reviewed the reported prevalence of lifetime sexual assault victimization (LSA), and where available, childhood sexual assault (CSA), adult sexual assault (ASA), intimate partner sexual assault (IPSA), and hate crime-related sexual assault (HC). The studies were grouped into those that used a probability or census sampling technique (n=25) and those that used a non-probability or “community-based” sampling technique (n=50). A total of 139,635 GLB respondents participated in the underlying studies reviewed. Prevalence estimates of LSA ranged from 15.6–85.0% for LB women, and 11.8–54.0% for GB men. Considering the median estimates derived from the collective set of studies reviewed, LB women were more likely to report CSA, ASA, LSA and IPSA than GB men, whereas GB men were more likely to report HC than LB women. Across all studies, the highest estimates reported were for LSA of LB women (85%), CSA of LB women (76.0%), and CSA of GB men (59.2%). With some exceptions, studies using non-probability samples reported higher sexual assault prevalence rates than did population-based or census sample studies. The challenges of assessing sexual assault victimization with GLB populations are discussed, as well as the implications for practice, policy and future research.