Reactivity to positive and negative behavior in distressed and nondistressed married couples.

Reactivity to positive and negative behavior in distressed and nondistressed married couples.
复制标题

痛苦和非痛苦已婚夫妇对积极和消极行为的反应。

DOI:
10.1037//0022-006x.50.5.706
复制
发表时间:
1982
影响因子:
5.9
通讯作者:
McDonald,DW
McDonald,DW
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jacobson,NS;Follette,WC;McDonald,DW

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

测试了反应性假设,即痛苦的已婚夫妇比没有痛苦的夫妇对最近的高价事件(积极或消极)做出更多反应。21对婚姻幸福的夫妇和20对寻求婚姻治疗的夫妇在家中收集了2周的夜间数据,记录了积极、消极和中性事件的频率以及全球日常满意度。党卫军还完成了二元调整量表。与过去的研究一样,与婚姻痛苦的行为模型一致,痛苦的夫妇报告的积极行为的比例比没有痛苦的夫妇低,而消极行为的比例高。与假设一致的是,痛苦的配偶比没有痛苦的配偶对最近发生的事件更有反应。他们对婚姻关系的主观满意度在很大程度上取决于最近发生的积极或消极事件的频率,而不是婚姻幸福的夫妇。有证据表明,这些反应性差异不仅仅是行为频率差异的函数,而且过程反应性可以从实验和统计上与积极和消极交换的频率分开。研究了反应性和其他感兴趣变量之间的关系。(参考文献23)(心理信息数据库记录(C)2016 APA,保留所有权利)
Tested the reactivity hypothesis that distressed married couples react more to recent, high-valence events (positive or negative) than their nondistressed counterparts. 21 happily married couples and 20 couples seeking marital therapy collected nightly data in the home for 2 wks, recording both the frequency of positive, negative, and neutral events and global daily satisfaction ratings. Ss also completed the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. As in past studies, and consistent with a behavioral model of marital distress, distressed couples reported lower rates of positive behavior and higher rates of negative behavior than did nondistressed. Consistent with the hypothesis, distressed spouses were more reactive to recent events than were nondistressed. Their subjective satisfaction with the relationship depended to a greater degree on the frequency of recent positive or negative events than was the case for happily married couples. Evidence is provided that these reactivity differences were not simply a function of differences in behavioral frequencies and that the process reactivity is separable—both experimentally and statistically—from the frequency of positive and negative exchanges. The relationship between reactivity and other variables of interest is examined.(23 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)