Regulation by Incentives, Regulation of the Incentives in Urban Policies
Regulation by Incentives, Regulation of the Incentives in Urban Policies
复制标题
激励调节、城市政策激励调节
DOI：
10.1080/19186444.2010.11658232
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Vitale
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Vitale
摘要印第安纳州大学的制度分析与发展（IAD）框架对于推进城市比较研究具有重要意义。奥斯特罗姆的“制度语法”对解决城市配置冲突是有用的。这种冲突是更好地把握城市政治的宝贵切入点，特别是在比较研究中。本文介绍了一个理论和概念框架，以分析货币和非货币激励计划在城市政策领域的作用。在城市政策中考虑的激励措施可分为四类：（1）直接财政激励;（2）间接财政激励;（3）非财政激励;（4）更广泛的社会激励。城市经济学中的公共选择理论家对直接和间接的财政激励进行了深入的研究;非财政激励在某些形式的规划理论中得到了考虑，而更广泛的社会激励则受到城市社会学家的特别强调。本文强调了城市配置理论的相关性，即从自下而上和自上而下的角度，将四种激励机制结合起来。考虑到激励措施，而不仅仅是单一的激励措施（一个接一个），这是一个有希望的进步。据推测，这可以维持相关的发展比较城市研究。
Abstract The Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework developed at the University of Indiana is very promising for advancing comparative urban studies. Ostrom's “Grammar of Institutions” is useful for addressing urban allocative conflicts. Such conflicts are valuable entry points to better grasp urban politics, especially in comparative research. This paper introduces a theoretical and conceptual framework to analyse the role of monetary and non-monetary incentive schemes in the field of urban policies. The incentives to consider in urban policies can be divided into four categories: (1) direct financial incentives; (2) indirect financial incentives; (3) non-financial incentives; (4) broader social incentives. Direct and indirect financial incentives are well studied by public choices theorists in urban economics; non-financial incentives are considered in some forms of planning theory, while broader social incentives are especially stressed by urban sociologists. This paper stresses the relevance for urban theory of configurations that articulate the four kinds of incentives conjointly, from both a bottom-up perspective and a top-down perspective. Taking into account of incentives, and not only of single incentives (one by one), it is a promising advancement. It is hypothesized that this could sustain relevant development in comparative urban research.