Cation-pi interactions in simple aromatics: Electrostatics provide a predictive tool
Cation-pi interactions in simple aromatics: Electrostatics provide a predictive tool
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/ja9539608
复制
发表时间:
1996-03-06
影响因子:
15
通讯作者:
Dougherty, DA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mecozzi, S;West, AP;Dougherty, DA
In recent years, the cation-π interaction has come to be appreciated as an important noncovalent binding force. 1 Studies in the gas phase, 2 in aqueous media using synthetic receptors, 3 and in a biological context with a number of protein systems1, 4, 5 have established the broad scope and significance of this interaction. A complete, quantitative description of the cation-π interaction would involve a number of intermolecular forces, such as charge-quadrupole, charge-dipole, chargeinduced dipole, charge transfer, dispersion forces, and, in some cases, a hydrophobic component. However, we have argued1, 3a, 4 that, to first order, the major aspect of the cation-π interaction is electrostatic in nature, involving the interaction of the cation with the large, permanent quadrupole moment of the aromatic. 6 In the present work we describe an evaluation of the extent to which the electrostatic model can rationalize Variations in cation binding abilities among various aromatic systems. We find that, indeed, the electrostatic model provides a quantitative understanding of the trend seen across a series of prototypical aromatic systems.We have performed a series of ab initio computational studies on the binding of the sodium cation (Na+) to the π face of structures 1-11 (Chart 1). We consider such complexes to provide a good model for the quantitative trends expected in the cation-π interaction. For example, we have previously shown3b that using NH4+ in place of Na+ does not alter any trends in such data, and so these simpler model calculations are relevant to real experimental systems. Binding energies were evaluated at the 6-31G**//6-31G** level, 7 using the Gaussian 928 package. This level of theory is quite adequate for such a study. 9 To estimate the electrostatic contribution to binding, we replaced the Na+ of the optimized complex with a dummy probe atom and evaluated the electrostatic potential (EPopt) at that point. We also performed the same calculation using the geometry of the uncomplexed aromatic molecule and evaluating