Lack of Use in the Literature From the Last 20 Years Supports Dropping Traditional Schizophrenia Subtypes From DSM-5 and ICD-11
Lack of Use in the Literature From the Last 20 Years Supports Dropping Traditional Schizophrenia Subtypes From DSM-5 and ICD-11
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/schbul/sbt068
复制
发表时间：
2013-07-01
影响因子：
6.6
通讯作者：
Carpenter, William T.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Braff, David L.;Ryan, James;Carpenter, William T.
偏执狂、紧张症和青春期精神病的诊断先于早发性痴呆的使用，布莱根随后认识到一个异质性的“精神分裂症组”。“经过一些修改，传统的精神分裂症亚型已经在精神疾病诊断和统计手册（DSM）和国际疾病分类（ICD）分类系统中正式化多年。虽然精神分裂症亚型在过去被广泛使用，但目前尚不清楚它是否仍然被广泛使用或在21世纪的研究和临床实践中具有影响力，尤其是在科学文献中。对已发表文章的回顾显示，在过去20年（1990年，2000年，2010年）中，文献中传统亚型的使用从27.7%下降到9.8%至6.5%。因此，到2010年，在主要的文学场所使用亚型下降，
The diagnoses of paranoia, catatonia, and hebephrenia preceded the use of dementia praecox and Bleuler's subsequent recognition of a heterogenous "Group of Schizophrenias." With some modification, traditional schizophrenia subtypes have been formalized for many years in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) classification systems. While widely used in the past, it is not clear that the schizophrenia subtypes remain in wide use or are influential in 21st-century research and clinical practice, and especially in the scientific literature. A review of published articles reveals over the last 20 years (1990, 2000, 2010) the use of traditional subtypes in the literature has fallen from 27.7% to 9.8% to 6.5%. Thus, by 2010, the use of subtypes in the leading literature venues declined to