Masked translation priming: Varying language experience and word type with Spanish-English bilinguals
Masked translation priming: Varying language experience and word type with Spanish-English bilinguals
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s1366728909990393
复制
发表时间：
2010-04-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Ferre, Pilar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Davis, Chris;Sanchez-Casas, Rosa;Ferre, Pilar
使用带有词汇决策任务的掩蔽同源和非同源启动来研究西班牙语英语双语词汇组织。在实验 1 中，使用由同源和非同源翻译启动的西班牙语和英语目标对三组双语者（西班牙语主导、英语主导和平衡）和一组初级双语者（西班牙语）进行了测试。所有双语组都表现出同源启动，但没有非同源启动。这种同源修剪效应与语言内重复启动效应的程度相似。具有不同第二语言习得历史的参与者之间没有差异，启动效应的大小也不受翻译方向的调节。开始的双语组仅在启动项为西班牙语（L1）且目标为英语（L2）时才表现出同源启动。在实验 2 中，对一组双语者使用了与形式相关和不相关的单词基线。结果与实验 I 一样炒：同源引发且无非同源引发。实验 3 检查了减少字法和音系重叠的同源启动效应。尽管形式重叠减少，但发现同源效应与语言内重复效应的大小相同。这些结果表明同源翻译是特殊的，并且考虑了修改双语词汇处理模型以反映这一点的方法。
Spanish English bilingual lexical organization was investigated using masked cognate and non-cognate priming with the lexical decision task. In Experiment 1, three groups of bilinguals (Spanish dominant, English dominant and Balanced) and a single group of beginning bilinguals (Spanish) were tested with Spanish and English targets primed by cognate and non-cognate translations. All the bilingual groups showed cognate but not non-cognate priming. This cognate pruning effect was similar in magnitude to the within-language repetition priming effect; it did not vary across participants who had different second-language acquisition histories, nor was the size of the priming effect modulated by the direction of translation. The beginning bilingual group only showed cognate priming when the primes were in Spanish (L1) and the targets in English (L2). In Experiment 2, both form-related and unrelated word baselines were used with a single group of bilinguals. The results were the saute as Experiment I: cognate priming and no non-cognate priming. Experiment 3 examined the cognate priming effect with reduced orthographic and phonological overlap. Despite this reduced form overlap, it was found that the cognate effect was the same size as the within-language repetition effect. These results indicate that cognate translations are special and ways of modifying models of bilingual lexical processing to reflect this were considered.