Association of National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Career Development Awards With Subsequent Research Project Grant Funding
Association of National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Career Development Awards With Subsequent Research Project Grant Funding
复制标题
DOI：
10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4305
复制
发表时间：
2018-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
26.1
通讯作者：
Bianchi, Diana W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Twombly, Dennis A.;Glavin, Sarah L.;Bianchi, Diana W.
投资于下一代研究人员至关重要，正如最近在21世纪世纪治愈法案中强调的那样。自成立以来，尤尼斯·肯尼迪·施莱佛国家儿童健康和人类发展研究所（NICHD）一直支持培训和职业发展，以确保有一个强大的调查人员队伍，他们准备领导各自的调查领域。近年来，NICHD强调机构对个人的培训奖励比许多其他国立卫生研究院的类似size.Objective更大程度上评估个人的成功支持NICHD的职业发展和培训奖，作为衡量随后的应用和接收独立的国立卫生研究院研究项目赠款fund.DESIGN，SETTIN，这项回顾性队列研究确定了417名医生学者，他们在1999年10月1日至2001年9月30日期间获得了NICHD职业发展奖的支持。选择这一时期是为了充分跟踪研究项目赠款申请和资金。在这些医生学者中，355人符合纳入标准。主要结果和措施主要结果是提交的研究项目资助申请的数量，其中，成功资助的数量。仅获得医学博士学位并获得K奖或同时获得个人K奖和机构K12支持的学者比仅获得K12支持（仅个体K与仅机构K12：比值比[OR]，4.86; 95%CI，1.83-13.62; K和K12均与仅K12：OR，3]9; 95%CI，1.46-7.10）申请后续项目补助资金（分别为88.0% vs 82.8% vs 60.1%; P < .001）和接受它（分别为60.0% vs 60.9% vs 32.9%; P < .001）。对于医生与MD和博士学位，无论是申请还是资助率在统计上显着不同，他们的职业发展是否支持个人或机构awards.CONCLUSIONS和相关性医生学者更有可能申请和接收美国国立卫生研究院的研究补助金，如果他们是在个人的职业发展奖，有或没有机构培训奖。根据这些数据，NICHD打算将其职业发展基金分配的更大比例用于个人奖励。NICHD认识到机构奖励的重要性，并将继续支持它们。NICHD仍然致力于培训，并打算继续投资于培训和职业发展奖励。
IMPORTANCE Investing in the next generation of researchers is essential, as recently highlighted in the 21st Century Cures Act. From its inception, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) has supported training and career development to ensure a robust pipeline of investigators who are prepared to lead their respective fields of inquiry. In recent years, the NICHD has emphasized institutional over individual training awards to a greater degree than many other National Institutes of Health institutes of similar size.OBJECTIVE To evaluate the success of individuals supported by NICHD career development and training awards, as measured by subsequent application and receipt of independent National Institutes of Health research project grant funding.DESIGN, SETTIN, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study identified 417 physician-scholars who were supported by NICHD career development awards between October 1, 1999, and September 30, 2001. This period was selected to allow adequate follow-up of research project grant applications and funding. Among these physician scholars, 355 met inclusion criteria.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were the numbers of research project grant applications submitted and, of these, the numbers that were successfully funded.RESULTS Among 355 physician-scientists, scholars who had an MD degree only and received a K award or both an individual K award and institutional K12 support were more likely than those who received only K12 support (individual K only vs institutional K12 only: odds ratio [OR], 4.86; 95% CI, 1.83-13.62; both K and K12 vs K12 only: OR, 3]9; 95% CI, 1.46-7.10) to apply for subsequent project grant funding (88.0% vs 82.8% vs 60.1%, respectively; P < .001) and to receive it (60.0% vs 60.9% vs 32.9%, respectively; P < .001). For physicians with both MD and PhD degrees, neither application nor funding rates were statistically significantly different whether their career development was supported by individual or institutional awards.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Physician-scholars are more likely to apply for and receve a National Institutes of Health research grant if they are trained on an individual career development award, with or without an institutional training award. Based on the data, the NICHD intends to provide a greater proportion of its career development fund allocation to individual awards. The NICHD recognizes the importance of institutional awards and will continue to support them. The NICHD remains committed to training and intends to maintain its investment in training and career development awards going forward.