Structuralist heroes and points of heresy: recognizing Gilles Deleuze's (anti-)structuralism
Structuralist heroes and points of heresy: recognizing Gilles Deleuze's (anti-)structuralism
复制标题
结构主义英雄和异端观点：认识吉尔·德勒兹的（反）结构主义
DOI：
10.1007/s11007-021-09562-9
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
Campbell I
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Campbell I
本文探讨德勒兹与结构主义“决裂”的地位和利害关系。特别关注德勒兹的过渡文本，1967/1972文章“我们如何认识结构主义？”它问德勒兹如何理解结构主义，以及为什么在他遇到费利克斯·瓜塔里和瓜塔里自己的过渡文本，1969年的“机器与结构”之后，德勒兹觉得有必要与结构主义决裂。它认为，阅读这两个文本一起让我们看到，德勒兹已经察觉到结构主义项目内的紧张局势，并认为，瓜塔里的非结构性的机器帐户允许德勒兹澄清这种看法，并认为这是必要的离开结构主义。然而，在结束时，它转向了哲学家如Étienne Balibar和Patrice Maniglier最近的工作，这些工作重新审视了结构主义时刻，并确定了德勒兹和瓜塔里的“后结构主义”可能是一部分的持续遗产。通过考虑德勒兹和瓜塔里的突破与结构主义的光这项工作，本文认为如何由德勒兹和瓜塔里的结构主义的论战拒绝可能无法完全解释正在进行的遗产的结构主义程序和持久性的结构主义问题在他们的思想。
This article is concerned with the status and stakes of Gilles Deleuze’s “break” with structuralism. With a particular focus on a transitional text of Deleuze, the 1967/1972 article “How Do We Recognize Structuralism?,” it asks how Deleuze understood structuralism and why, after his encounter with Félix Guattari and Guattari’s own transitional text, 1969’s “Machine and Structure,” Deleuze felt the need to break with structuralism. It argues that reading these two texts together allows us to see that Deleuze already perceived tensions within the structuralist project, and argues that Guattari’s non-structural account of the machine allowed Deleuze to clarify this perception, and see it as necessitating a departure from structuralism. To close, however, it turns to recent work by philosophers such as Étienne Balibar and Patrice Maniglier that re-examines the structuralist moment and identifies an ongoing legacy that the “poststructuralism” of Deleuze and Guattari may be part of. By considering Deleuze and Guattari’s break with structuralism in light of this work, this article considers how the polemical rejection of structuralism by Deleuze and Guattari may not fully account for the ongoing legacy of the structuralist program and the persistence of a structuralist problematic in their thought.