'Generative' or 'parasitic' urbanism? Some observations from the recent history of a South Indian market town
'Generative' or 'parasitic' urbanism? Some observations from the recent history of a South Indian market town
复制标题
“生成”还是“寄生”城市化？
DOI：
10.1080/00220388408421907
复制
发表时间：
1984
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
J. Harriss
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Harriss;J. Harriss
本文利用 1973 年和 1982-3 年对印度南部集镇进行的抽样调查数据，探讨了梅勒和利普顿在农业经济不断发展的背景下对小城镇及其腹地关系的不同看法。结果表明，“绿色革命”产生的需求模式并没有像梅勒的模型那样鼓励分散生产。然而，资源从农村向城镇的净转移似乎确实已经发生，如利普顿模型假设的那样，尽管作者仍然对这一模型的解释持怀疑态度。
Using data from sample surveys in a South Indian market town in 1973 and 1982–3, the paper examines the different views ofMellor andLipton on the relations of small towns and their hinterlands, in the context of a growing agricultural economy. It is shown that the pattern of demand which has been generated by the ‘green revolution’ has not encouraged decentralised production, as in Mellor's model. It does appear, however, that a net transfer of resources from the countryside to the town, such as Lipton ‘s model postulates, has been taking place, though the authors remain sceptical about this model as an explanation.