Deep Design: Pathways To A Livable Future
Deep Design: Pathways To A Livable Future
复制标题
深度设计:通往宜居未来的途径
DOI:
10.5070/g31710281
复制
发表时间:
1995
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Flora G. Shrode
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Flora G. Shrode
Review: Deep Design: pathways to a livable future. By David Wann Reviewed by Flora G. Schrode University of Tennessee Wann, David. Deep Design: pathways to a livable future. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1996. 216 pp. US $24.95 ISBN: 1-55963-420-0. Deep Design is presented as an approach to developing high quality and high performance processes for industrial and community activities. This approach rejects obsolete patterns of the industrial revolution and adopts practices which can help preserve the world’s biological and cultural wealth. Denouncing supply-side economics for its emphasis on finding ways to convert resources to profits, author David Wann says humans should approach life in a manner modeled on observable patterns of systems in nature. Wann explains that natural systems' characteristics of feedback, diversity, and flexibility can be incorporated into design principles for structures, regulatory systems, and social or community arrangements. He proposes that such a transformation will make life more satisfying for people because they will have better quality products, services, and physical infrastructure, and more time in which to enjoy these things with their families and friends. Very readable, the text of Deep Design is replete with examples of companies, communities, and industrial processes where deep design could offer improvement or is currently offering improvement. For each example, Wann outlines collaboration between stakeholders and describes the positive impact of deep design implementation. The result is a glimpse into the enormous benefit deep design principles would offer society. Discussions of values, including the importance of resource conservation, surface throughout the book. Wann would like us to rethink fundamental assumptions behind many commercial and community processes. He argues that the market and GNP should no longer be the major forces behind U.S. and other countries’ manufacturing methods (whether it be design conception, resource gathering, product generation, or the delivery of goods to consumers.) He proposes that a worldwide change in attitude is crucial. People can maintain their quality of life only if they reject the importance of material goods (grounded in traditional supply-