The Left Behind: Decline and Rage in Rural America
The Left Behind: Decline and Rage in Rural America
复制标题
落后者:美国农村的衰落与愤怒
DOI:
10.1093/sf/soy118
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Jennifer Sherman
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jennifer Sherman
Politics of Resentment and Hochschild’s Strangers in Their Own Land. Based on a decade of research on rural America, the book is well situated to address this question. Wuthnow consciously positions this book as another explanation for the rise of Trump, and attempts to adjudicate between existing explanations of economic suffering versus racism and misogyny. The book does less to resolve this question than it does to elucidate the ways in which these issues are discussed by rural residents, as well as to introduce new explanations for their voting behaviors. Wuthnow presents rural towns as “moral communities” that are threatened by forces of modernity including deindustrialization, consolidation in the agricultural industry, population decline, and a host of social problems. The ensuing moral outrage, he argues, comes from “a mixture of fear and anger”(p. 6) that rural communities are both disappearing and under siege. The book explores the sources of this outrage through chapters that look in depth at the meanings of place and community to rural dwellers; threats to rural communities; grassroots attempts to address rural social problems; dissatisfaction with Washington and the government; concerns regarding moral decline; and bigotry and racism. The writing is clear and concise, making The Left Behind an easy, swift read. It is pitched toward a mainstream audience rather than an academic one, mostly avoiding theory or engagement with existing literature, although a section at the end of the book points readers toward further reading on a number of rural topics and issues. Unlike many other studies in this genre, a strength of Wuthnow’s book is that it includes interview data from across the rural US, rather than looking in depth at a single case study or field site. He draws from a dataset that includes more than 1,000 in-depth interviews in multiple field sites, including discussions of a wide range of sources of both pride