Measuring the processes and outcomes of post-disaster housing recovery: lessons from Gölcük, Turkey
Measuring the processes and outcomes of post-disaster housing recovery: lessons from Gölcük, Turkey
复制标题
衡量灾后住房恢复的过程和结果：土耳其格尔居克的经验教训
作者：
N. Ganapati
尽管关于灾后恢复的文献越来越多，但我们对如何衡量住房恢复的理解仍然有限。本文是填补文献中的差距的一个步骤，介绍了恢复组织如何衡量Gölcük，土耳其，1999年8月17日地震后的灾后永久性住房恢复的概述。基于深入访谈、焦点小组、参与者观察和对二手资料的审查，本文强调了以及时建造的永久性住房单元数量来衡量住房恢复的局限性。它建议，恢复组织需要通过制定针对具体情况、面向过程和成果的措施来衡量灾后住房恢复情况。在Gölcük的情况下，面向过程的措施可能与土地征用、公众参与过程和组织间合作有关，而面向结果的措施可能与对所建住房的满意程度和住房受益人之间的公平有关。
Despite a growing literature on post-disaster recovery, our understanding of how housing recovery is measured remains limited. This paper is a step in filling the gap in the literature by presenting an overview of how recovery organizations measured post-disaster permanent housing recovery in Gölcük, Turkey, following the August 17, 1999 earthquake. Based on in-depth interviews, focus groups, participant observation, and review of secondary sources, the paper highlights the limitations of measuring housing recovery as the number of permanent housing units built in a timely manner. It suggests that recovery organizations need to measure post-disaster housing recovery by developing context-specific, process- and outcome-oriented measures. In the case of Gölcük, process-oriented measures could have been related to the land appropriation, public participation processes, and inter-organizational collaboration while outcome-oriented measures could have been related to the level of satisfaction with homes built and equity among the housing beneficiaries.