Design for Buildability and the Deconstruction Consequences
Design for Buildability and the Deconstruction Consequences
复制标题
可建造性设计和解构后果
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Crowther
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Crowther
一座建筑物的拆卸可能听起来与其组装相反，但实际上很少以这种方式发生。缓慢而细致的施工过程需要大量的人员、大量的材料和很长的时间。这一顺序的颠倒通常是作为拆除来实施的，只需要很少的时间和施工顺序的努力。尽管存在这些通常的差异，但如果采用有控制的顺序拆卸而不是拆除，那么建造和拆卸的顺序基本上可以是相同的，一个只是另一个的颠倒。
本文提出了一个讨论的可建性和概念，设计一个易于组装的建筑也可能导致易于拆卸，以供未来的再利用和回收。易于装配或易于建造的设计原则可以被改造成便于拆卸的设计原则。
如果要尝试和设计这种反向排序，那么可构建性的启发式原则和更广泛的哲学或更好的组装方法都应该是设计拆卸的宝贵知识来源。
The disassembly of a building may sound like the opposite of its assembly, but in practice it seldom occurs this way. The slow careful process of construction requires large numbers of people, large quantities of materials, and long periods of time. The reversal of this sequence is usually practiced as demolition and requires very little of the time and effort of the construction sequence. Despite these usual differences, if controlled and sequential disassembly were practiced instead of demolition, the construction and disassembly sequences could essentially be the same, one simply being the reversal of the other.
This paper presents a discussion of buildability and the notion that designing a building for ease of assembly might also lead to ease of disassembly for future reuse and recycling. Principles of design for ease of assembly, or ease of construction, can be adapted to become principles of design for disassembly.
If such reverse sequencing were to be attempted and designed for, both heuristic principles of buildability and broader philosophies or approaches to better assembly, should be valuable sources of knowledge in designing for disassembly.