Empirical Study of Easy and Hard Examples in CNN Training
Empirical Study of Easy and Hard Examples in CNN Training
复制标题
CNN 训练中简单和困难示例的实证研究
DOI:
10.1007/978-3-030-36808-1_20
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hideki Nakayama
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ikki Kishida;Hideki Nakayama
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) generalize well despite their massive size and capability of memorizing all examples. There is a hypothesis that DNNs start learning from simple patterns and the hypothesis is based on the existence of examples that are consistently well-classified at the early training stage (i.e.,easy examples) and examples misclassified (i.e.,hard examples). Easy examples are the evidence that DNNs start learning from specific patterns and there is a consistent learning process. It is important to know how DNNs learn patterns and obtain generalization ability, however, properties of easy and hard examples are not thoroughly investigated (e.g., contributions to generalization and visual appearances). In this work, we study the similarities of easy and hard examples respectively for different Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures, assessing how those examples contribute to generalization. Our results show that easy examples are visually similar to each other and hard examples are visually diverse, and both examples are largely shared across different CNN architectures. Moreover, while hard examples tend to contribute more to generalization than easy examples, removing a large number of easy examples leads to poor generalization. By analyzing those results, we hypothesize that biases in a dataset and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) are the reasons why CNNs have consistent easy and hard examples. Furthermore, we show that large scale classification datasets can be efficiently compressed by usingeasinessproposed in this work.