Development of the PROMIS positive emotional and sensory expectancies of smoking item banks.

Development of the PROMIS positive emotional and sensory expectancies of smoking item banks.
复制标题

开发吸烟项目库的 PROMIS 积极情绪和感官期望。

DOI:
10.1093/ntr/ntt281
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Cai,Li
Cai,Li
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tucker,JoanS;Shadel,WilliamG;Edelen,MariaOrlando;Stucky,BrianD;Li,Zhen;Hansen,Mark;Cai,Li

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

吸烟的积极情绪和感官预期包括提高认知能力,积极的情感状态和愉快的感觉运动感觉。本文介绍了积极的情绪和感官期望的吸烟项目银行的发展,这将有助于标准化的日常和nondaily cigarette smokers.MethodsData之间的评估这一结构来自日常(N= 4,201)和nondaily(N=1,183)吸烟者完成了在线调查。为了确定一个一维的项目集,我们进行了项目因素分析,项目反应理论分析和差异项目功能分析。此外,我们评估了固定项目的简短形式(SF)和计算机自适应测试(CAT)的性能,以有效地评估construct.Results18个项目被列入项目银行(15个常见的日常和非日常吸烟者,1个独特的日常,2个独特的非日常)。试题库是强一维的,高度可靠的(可靠性= 0.95),并在性别,年龄和种族/民族组之间表现相似。每日吸烟者和非每日吸烟者共同的SF由6个项目组成(可靠性= 0.86)。从模拟CAT的结果表明,平均而言,少于8个项目需要评估的结构与足够的精度使用项目banks.ConclusionsThese分析确定了一组新的项目,可以评估积极的情绪和感官预期的吸烟在一个可靠的和标准化的方式。通过使用SF题库,采用计算机自适应测试,或选择针对特定研究或临床目的的项目子集,可以实现评估该结构的相当高的效率。
IntroductionThe positive emotional and sensory expectancies of cigarette smoking include improved cognitive abilities, positive affective states, and pleasurable sensorimotor sensations. This paper describes development of Positive Emotional and Sensory Expectancies of Smoking item banks that will serve to standardize the assessment of this construct among daily and nondaily cigarette smokers.MethodsData came from daily (N= 4,201) and nondaily (N=1,183) smokers who completed an online survey. To identify a unidimensional set of items, we conducted item factor analyses, item response theory analyses, and differential item functioning analyses. Additionally, we evaluated the performance of fixed-item short forms (SFs) and computer adaptive tests (CATs) to efficiently assess the construct.ResultsEighteen items were included in the item banks (15 common across daily and nondaily smokers, 1 unique to daily, 2 unique to nondaily). The item banks are strongly unidimensional, highly reliable (reliability = 0.95 for both), and perform similarly across gender, age, and race/ethnicity groups. A SF common to daily and nondaily smokers consists of 6 items (reliability = 0.86). Results from simulated CATs indicated that, on average, less than 8 items are needed to assess the construct with adequate precision using the item banks.ConclusionsThese analyses identified a new set of items that can assess the positive emotional and sensory expectancies of smoking in a reliable and standardized manner. Considerable efficiency in assessing this construct can be achieved by using the item bank SF, employing computer adaptive tests, or selecting subsets of items tailored to specific research or clinical purposes.